Submited on: 26 Sep 2010 06:04:56 PM GMT
Published on: 27 Sep 2010 07:15:37 AM GMT
Posted by Dr. Simon B Thompson on 11 Mar 2011 07:22:40 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    An interesting subject rather over-complicated in style. However, I can appreciate the work that has gone into prodcuing the paper.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rehabilitation and multi-disciplinary collaboration in clinical and research settings.

  • How to cite:  Thompson S B.Immuno-prophylaxis...[Review of the article 'Immuno-prophylaxis against development of cardiac valvular complications in patients with rheumatic fever: A proposed method ' by Tonpay P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00575
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse