Submited on: 10 Apr 2012 03:02:48 AM GMT
Published on: 10 Apr 2012 05:43:08 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This  paper highlights the importance of clear margins after radical prostatectomy.

    Margin involvement may be associated with higher risk of biochemal failure. 

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have been a urologist for more than 20 years

  • How to cite:  Odey J O.the significance of margin involvement in radical prostatectomy specimens for presumed localised adenocarcinoma of prostate in relation to PSA(BIOCHEMICAL) Failure rate[Review of the article 'The Significance of Margin Involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Presumed Localized Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in Relation to PSA (Biochemical) Failure Rate ' by Barnes D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001796
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments: Well written paper with original contribution but not new Several PSA values said to reflect biochemical recurrence were referred to but not stated. Also in those cases were the postoperative PSA values reflecting recurrence were given, stating the pre-op values would have been helpful
  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Eke, N and Essiet, A. Cancer of the prostate gland: so much verbiage, so little mileage? Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. Jan-Mar 2011; 1: 3-30
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
    Practicing urologist in a university hospital setting
  • How to cite:  Essiet A .Margin involvement and biochemical recurrence in Ca. Prostate patients treated by radical prostatectomy[Review of the article 'The Significance of Margin Involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Presumed Localized Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in Relation to PSA (Biochemical) Failure Rate ' by Barnes D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001756
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The correlation between PSA and Glisson grading of prostate cancer has been and is still an interesting area of research.

    The diagnosis of prostate cancer based on PSA is not acceptable , biopsies may increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

    MR of prostate is contributing significantly to diagnosis and local staging.

    All of this modalities need to be exhausted before deciding on prostatectomy.

     

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Consultant Radiologist, interventional Uro-Radiology.

    Experience in Diagnostic of prostate cancer

  • How to cite:  Bakir E .The Significance of Margin involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Presumed localized Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in Relation to PSA[Review of the article 'The Significance of Margin Involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Presumed Localized Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in Relation to PSA (Biochemical) Failure Rate ' by Barnes D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001702
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Overall, a very well written article.  The article would have benefitted from a couple of examples, alongwith imaging and histology to show thw cases where there was PSA failure and where there was marginal involvement.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am radiologist with about 18 years experience in imaging

  • How to cite:  Koteyar S R.Review of Signifcance of margin involvement in radical prostatectomy[Review of the article 'The Significance of Margin Involvement in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Presumed Localized Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in Relation to PSA (Biochemical) Failure Rate ' by Barnes D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001685
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse