Submited on: 17 Apr 2012 09:26:40 AM GMT
Published on: 17 Apr 2012 12:18:36 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a good study in a novel and interesting way of teaching.  Here results are not very encouraging but it only shows there is scope for changing few things like

     

    The video diary can split into presenting complaints, then take students opinion

    examination of patient and ask for the finding or opinion of students, ask for treatment

    Treatment prescription can be shown

    finally the patients perspective his changes in life or worsening, financial social changes.

     

    This might make a sea change in the approach of students towards patients

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Have five papers in Medical education technologies

    presented posters in National and international conferences

    trained in medical education technologies

  • How to cite:  Satish N S.Patient video diaries is a good method for inculcating Professionalism in pre-clinical undergraduates[Review of the article 'Evaluation of the Role of Patient Video Diaries as a Part of a Professionalism Module for Pre-Clinical Undergraduates ' by Kennedy K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001703
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The aim of this paper is to show a new "teaching device" and, IMHO, it's interesting...

  • Competing interests:
    Nothing
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Teaching in nursing degree

  • How to cite:  Tarantini F .Evaluation of the role of patient video diaries...[Review of the article 'Evaluation of the Role of Patient Video Diaries as a Part of a Professionalism Module for Pre-Clinical Undergraduates ' by Kennedy K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001698
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The aim of this paper was to show a novel teaching weapon and it was very successful!

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have been teaching medicine for the last 30 years.

  • How to cite:  Bedin V .evaluation of the role of patient video diaries as a part of a profssionalism module for pre clinical undergraduates[Review of the article 'Evaluation of the Role of Patient Video Diaries as a Part of a Professionalism Module for Pre-Clinical Undergraduates ' by Kennedy K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001697
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse