Submited on: 18 Dec 2011 11:48:18 AM GMT
Published on: 19 Dec 2011 03:43:52 PM GMT
Posted by Dr. Marco Luchetti on 04 Apr 2012 07:07:35 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    The paper in its present form looks more like a book chapter. It is definitely inadequate as a journal article.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Consultant in Critical Care with particular interest in Respiratory Medicine.

  • How to cite:  Luchetti M .Pneumonia[Review of the article 'Pneumonia ' by Asmawi M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001646
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse