WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. Guadalupe Garcia on 03 Apr 2012 01:51:28 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	No
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	No
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:

They were not considered: C trachomatis, is not mentioned whether if others species of candida were found, such as C. tropicalis, failed search chancroid, gonorrhea, herpes, human papillomavirus, hepatitis B, syphilis and HIV / AIDS. Also in the article mentions bacterial vaginitis instead of bacterial vaginosis.

Statistical analysis is needed.

We need tables and references are few and are not updated.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I have a practical experience of 20 years.
How to cite: Garcia G .Epidemiological study of reproductive tract infections in rural area of Indore District[Review of the article 'Epidemiological Study of Reproductive Tract Infections in Rural Area of Indore District. ' by Berad A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001641

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Posted by Dr. M C Yadavannavar on 30 Mar 2012 07:04:10 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The article is a original article and has covered important topic. It will contribute significantly to the current knowledge about reproductive tract infections in India.
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Conducted reviews of Various Epidemiological and case studies in medical specialities in the past.
How to cite: Yadavannavar M C.Epidemiological Study of Reproductive Tract Infections in Rural Indore.[Review of the article 'Epidemiological Study of Reproductive Tract Infections in Rural Area of Indore District. ' by Berad A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001638

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse