Home » Reviews
An Unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature
By Mr. Anthony Venyo , Dr. Sarang Shah , Dr. Niranjan Desai
Submited on: 15 Oct 2011 04:14:13 PM GMT
Published on: 16 Oct 2011 08:34:20 AM GMT
 
Urological complications of anterior sacral meningocele
Posted by Prof. Akanimo Essiet on 11 Dec 2011 07:54:11 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments: 1. The subject is neurosurgical but there are significant urological complications 2. The title of the paper would better read "Anterior sacral meningocele presenting with severe urological complications"
  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
    Practicing urologist
  • How to cite:  Essiet A .Urological complications of anterior sacral meningocele[Review of the article 'An Unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001230
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
An unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele
Posted by Dr. Emad Bakir on 04 Nov 2011 03:03:00 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Well written Paper on a widely known subject, and demonstrates the impact of Meningceles on the Urine bladder retention and what are the sequences if this remains untreated.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a consultant Radiologist, and resposible for the diagnosis and interpretation of such findings.

  • How to cite:  Bakir E .An unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele[Review of the article 'An Unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001094
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
 
 
We use cookies on this website to measure and improve performance. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.