-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
-
Other Comments:
Comments
3. The originality is not so high. Attempted investigation is considered to be valuable.
5, 6. Explanation of figures or tables should be corrected. For example, FC1 or FC2 is not explained anywhere. In addition, it should be stated which formulation is promising.
8. As stated above, more explanation of formulations or abbreviations is needed. (Page 5, bottom, left) Eudragit RS 100 is not dissolved at pH of more than 7, I think. Please check that.
11. This study is an in vitro one. Preparation and in vitro evaluation should be included in the keywords
-
Competing interests:
No
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
I have ever judged 30 – 40 papers in the pharmaceutical field. As to colonic delivery, I have judged several papers.
- How to cite: H O . Design, optimization and evaluation of pH responsive Prednisolone sustained release tablet for ileo-colonic delivery [Review of the article 'Design Optimization and Evaluation of pH Responsive Prednisolone Sustained Release Tablet for Ileo-colonic Delivery ' by Baria A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00599
THIS ARTICLE IS REALLY WORTHY OF BEING PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL AS IT GIVES SERIOUS KNOWLEDGE AS WELL AS UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THIS TYPE OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM. ONE CAN DO RESEARCH IN THIS AREA BY REFERING THIS ARTICLE. IT'S A REALLY PATH SHOWING ARTICLE IN THIS REGARD.
NO
Yes
No
None
1 YEAR EXPERIENCE IN GUIDING THE B.PHARM AND M.PHARM STUDENTS ON THIS TOPIC.