Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Partly
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
Personal opinion of the author with very small database. No discussion of differnet opinion (buit I dont know, if tehre exist different opinions in the literature of the field of anästhesia?)
Competing interests: no
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
General Neurologist
How to cite: Gerhard C .Short Review of G. Bolligs Artikel[Review of the article 'Can Inhaled Induction Be Considered As Safe In Patients With Mc Ardles Disease? ' by Bollig G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00485
Personal opinion of the author with very small database. No discussion of differnet opinion (buit I dont know, if tehre exist different opinions in the literature of the field of anästhesia?)
no
Yes
No
None
General Neurologist