Submited on: 23 Nov 2012 05:23:45 PM GMT
Published on: 24 Nov 2012 03:07:41 PM GMT
 

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    Rupture of gravid uterus and its management are mentioned in a case report


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    Not new but a case report


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    Yes


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    Yes


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    No protocol this a case report of a single case


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    Yes Routine procedures mentioned briefly. Details unneccessary for a case report


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    Case analysis of multiple cases and the most important clinical indicators and therpapuetic management signals would be useful


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    Average not outstanding


  • Other Comments:

    The authors should mention the reference numbers over the entire text in square brackets otherwise their mention is very confusing. " The theatre and anaesthetists were informed. Surgeons were also invited" Such general comments should be avoided in a scientific writing. "2 pints of blood" These units of measurement are obsolete and the authors should use follow the most recent units of measurement.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Animal reproduction

  • How to cite:  Anonymous.Rupture of Gravid Uterus Following Road Traffic Accident. Literature Review and Case Report [Review of the article 'Rupture of Gravid Uterus Following Road Traffic Accident. Literature Review and Case Report ' by Yusuf M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(11):WMCRW002357
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Ruptured Gravid Uterus
Posted by Dr. Mohammad Othman on 24 Nov 2012 10:37:16 PM GMT

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    Case report with no claims


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    NA


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    NA


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    NA


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    NA


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    NA


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    History of all previous deliveries


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    Good paper


  • Other Comments:

    Intra operative pictures would be appreciated

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Consultant dealing with similar cases

  • How to cite:  Othman M .Ruptured Gravid Uterus[Review of the article 'Rupture of Gravid Uterus Following Road Traffic Accident. Literature Review and Case Report ' by Yusuf M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(11):WMCRW002351
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse