Case Report
 

By Dr. Simon Turner , Dr. Judith Hugh
Corresponding Author Dr. Simon Turner
Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, - Canada
Submitting Author Dr. Simon Turner
Other Authors Dr. Judith Hugh
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, - Canada

PATHOLOGY

Male breast cancer, Lobular, Molecular genetics, Cancer genetics

Turner S, Hugh J. A Rare Case of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer in a Male. WebmedCentral PATHOLOGY 2010;1(9):WMC00824
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2010.00824
No
Submitted on: 30 Sep 2010 12:28:43 AM GMT
Published on: 30 Sep 2010 09:29:30 AM GMT

Abstract


Male breast cancer is rare, comprising 1% of all breast cancers and 1% of all cancers in men. Unlike in women, in men invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is very uncommon, making up 1% of all male breast cancers and 0.01% of all cancers in men. In the past, the low incidence of lobular breast cancer in men was thought to be due to a lack of lobular tissue in the male breast. However, the classical understanding of breast cancer development has been reexamined in recent years in the light of new evidence from molecular genetics studies. We present a case of a man with invasive lobular breast cancer. This case supports, and is explained by, an emerging understanding of breast cancer molecular evolution.

Introduction


Male breast cancer is a rare condition, comprising 1% of all breast cancers and 1% of all cancers in males. Principles of diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are similar for male and female patients, although detection tends to occur later in males than in females. Presumably because the male breast usually contains only ductal tissue and no lobules, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is the most common cause of male breast cancer. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is present in only 1% of cases. Emerging genetic evidence may support a mechanism for the development of ILC in the male breast. We present a case of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast in a male patient.

Case Report(s)


During an admission for the work-up and treatment of syncope and anemia a 69 year old male was found to have a palpable lesion in the right breast, deep to the nipple. No other masses were noted and the axilla was clinically normal. No predisposing factors for the development of breast cancer were present, including testicular abnormalities, liver cirrhosis, Kilinefelter’s syndrome or exogenous administration of estrogens or anti-androgens. He had no family history of breast or gastric cancer in male or female relatives.
A fine needle aspirate of the mass was performed which was highly suspicious for malignancy. As such, a right modified radical mastectomy and axillary node dissection was performed. A full metastatic work-up was negative.
Pathologic examination of the mass revealed an invasive lobular carcinoma. Tumor cells exhibited a classic single-file morphology and there was loss of expression of E-cadherin. Staining for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) was positive, but was negative for over expression of HER-2/neu. One of twelve lymph nodes obtained was also positive for invasive lobular carcinoma.
The patient recovered well from surgery and was given a course of adjuvant systemic therapy with an aromatase inhibitor. Given his poor functional status radiation therapy and traditional chemotherapeutic modalities were not recommended. At the time of submission for publication, approximately 2 years after diagnosis, he remains disease free and living independently. Informed consent for publication of this case report was obtained from the patient.

Discussion


Despite the usual absence of lobules in male breast tissue, males may still develop lobular carcinomas. The histologic appearance is similar to that seen in females. Tumor cells are seen in a single-file pattern. There tends to be a loss of expression of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin, positive ER and PR staining and negative staining for HER-2/neu. The exact pathogenesis of this disease is not entirely understood. In the female breast, the same multipotential stem cell gives rise to both ductal and lobular tissue types. It has been theorized that this may allow for the transformation of normal ductal cells into ILC. Molecular studies have identified a multi-step pathway from normal breast tissue to most subtypes of breast cancer. These findings have blurred the boundaries between the lobular and ductal carcinoma lineages. Such studies have lead to a hypothesized connection between recognized precursors of ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma. One proposed pathway involves the development of ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) that may then transform to lobular carcinoma in-situ and then ILC. If this theoretical evolution of normal tissue into ILC via DCIS can be demonstrated it may explain the occurrence of ILC in males.
As widespread screening programs are unavailable detection of male breast cancer requires a thorough physical exam. Imaging such as mammography has been employed but is of limited value and diagnosis, as in women, depends on fine needle aspiration or core / excisional biopsy. Treatment of male breast cancer remains controversial. The low incidence of ILC in men likely explains the lack of studies focusing on the treatment of this tumor type. In general, many principles are similar to that of female breast cancer. Surgical treatment consists of mastectomy, or if possible, lumpectomy, combined with a surgical evaluation of the ipsilateral axilla. The standard approach is axillary dissection, however recently sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as a potential therapy. The use of radiation therapy in men with breast cancer has not been standardized, however some authors have suggested its use for tumors >1cm and/or with >1 involved lymph node, or in any patients receiving lumpectomy. Standard chemotherapy regimens are employed for suitable patients with stage II and III disease, with anthracyclines becoming more commonly used than the CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen. Hormonal therapy may also be employed, including tamoxifen for ER+ tumors as well as therapies aimed at reducing the production of estrogens, such as aromitase inhibitors, GnRH agonists and orchiectomy.

Authors contribution(s)


ST reviewed the literature and prepared the manuscript
JH reviewed the case and assisted with manuscript preparation

References


1. Agarwal A,  Ayantunde AA, Rampaul R, et al. Male breast cancer: a review of clinical management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;103:11-21.
2. Carmalt HL, Mann LJ, Kennedy CW et al: Carcinoma of the male breast: A review and recommendations for management. Aust NZ J Surg. 1998;68:712-715.
3. Salvadori B, Saccozi R, Manzari A, et al: Prognosis of breast cancer in males: an analysis of 170 cases. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:930-5.
4. Simpson PS, Reis-Filho JS, Gale T et al: Molecular evolution of breast cancer. J Pathol. 2005;205:248-254.
5. Cutuil B, Cohen-Solal Le-Nir C, Serlin D, Kirova Y, Gaci Z, Lemanski Z, et al. Male breast cancer. Evolution of treatment and prognostic factors. Analysis of 489 cases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009; doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.04.002.
6. Gennari R, Curigliano G, Jereczek-Fossa BA et al: Male breast cancer: a special therapeutic problem.  Anything new? Int J Oncol. 2004;24:663-670.

Source(s) of Funding


No funding sources.

Competing Interests


No competing interests.

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
1 review posted so far

Male ILC
Posted by Dr. Sever AR on 26 Apr 2011 02:09:00 PM GMT

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)