My opinion
 

By Dr. Deepak Gupta , Dr. Sarwan Kumar
Corresponding Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Wayne State University, - United States of America 48201
Submitting Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Other Authors Dr. Sarwan Kumar
Wayne State University, Internal Medicine, - United States of America

INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Hand Hygiene; Hygiene Hypothesis; Auto-Glove Dispenser; Auto-Glove Remover

Gupta D, Kumar S. Save The Hands While Saving From Hands. WebmedCentral INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2018;9(5):WMC005459

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 15 May 2018 07:40:21 AM GMT
Published on: 15 May 2018 07:40:42 AM GMT

Abstract


There has been escalating stress on hand hygiene to ensure prevention of disease-transmission. However, it is time to concurrently give due consideration to counter-concerns inherent with hand hygiene precautions and hereafter, possibly suggest an alternative solution. Although gloves have been in use as barrier method, in the absence of technological advancement to aseptically wear on the clean gloves and then to aseptically tear off the dirty gloves, personnel are not able to do away with hand washing and/or hand rubbing prior to wearing on gloves as well as after tearing off gloves. The possible solution can be auto-glove dispenser and auto-glove remover that can prevent disease-transmission due to hands while avoiding wet-work-exposure dermatitis of the hands due to repetitive hand washing and/or hand rubbing.

Opinion


There has been escalating stress on hand hygiene to ensure prevention of disease-transmission.1 However, it is time to concurrently give due consideration to counter-concerns inherent with hand hygiene precautions and hereafter, possibly suggest an alternative solution. Hand washing with soap and water and hand rubbing with sanitizers aim at cleansing the "dirty" hands instead of barricading the hands to stay in a "clean" state.2-3 Although gloves have been in use as barrier method, in the absence of technological advancement to aseptically wear on the clean gloves and then to aseptically tear off the dirty gloves, personnel are not able to do away with hand washing and/or hand rubbing prior to wearing on gloves as well as after tearing off gloves.

 

The possible solution can be auto-glove dispenser and auto-glove remover that can prevent disease-transmission among human beings. Being innocently unaware about pre-existing products and patents,4-5 our independently thought-out schematic diagrams for the same to explain our current perspective are shown in Figures 1 and 2 wherein dispensing and removing of gloves under strict sterile conditions, with the ring of each to-be-dispensed glove acting as the sterile barrier for all other gloves next-in-the-line, can possibly make single-use non-sterile examination gloves redundant unless the futuristic auto-glove dispenser and auto-glove remover turn cost-prohibitive. In regards to their environmental burden, the single-use gloves dispensed by auto-glove dispenser can be collected in the specifically designed bins attached to auto-glove remover. Hereafter, depending on the manufacturers' recommendations and the environmental protection agencies' regulations, the material used for manufacturing gloves can determine the collected gloves' reusability or recyclability.         

 

Other avenues worth investigating can be (a) installing copper linings across the hospitals as an antiseptic measure;6-7 (b) cautioning against hugs/kisses/handshakes across workplace environments and possibly promoting no-touch greetings;8 and (c) inventing robots with cost-prohibitive and yet futuristically possible disposable mechanical hands to replace non-disposable human hands.9 However, in the interim, auto-glove dispenser and auto-glove remover can be explored to barricade human hands; this may not only curtail the spread of diseases but may also contain the risk of developing allergies and autoimmunity secondary to evolving hygiene hypothesis.10

 

While the Joint Commission may be asked to consider elaborating about (a) which all interactions amount to direct patient care and (b) disease transmission risks during workplace human interactions where patients are NOT involved,11 it can be safely assumed that workplace human interactions with possibilities for unavoidable contact can induce transmission of disease agents by human hands.12 However, the hygiene hypothesis raises concerns regarding obsessive-compulsive cleansing of hands wherein pathogens can get replaced by allergens/immunogens as with wet-work-exposure dermatitis.13-15

 

Summarily, while the rules are followed, the rules concurrently get questioned so that the rules can get rewritten depending on implications and complications recognized during "post-market-safety-surveillance" of current rules so as to equilibrate whatever is underdone with whatever is overdone. Henceforth, the futuristic calling can be multiple size (small-medium-large-extra-large) auto-glove dispenser and auto-glove remover at the entry-exit points of each uniquely occupied workspace and each hospital floor space uniquely catering to patients.

Reference(s)


  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Show Me the Science - Why Wash Your Hands? (Updated Nov 18, 2015.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/why-hand washing.html.
  2. Mayo Clinic. Hand-washing: Do's and don'ts. (Updated Jan 10, 2018.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/hand-washing/art-20046253.
  3. World Health Organization. Alcohol-Based Handrub Risks/Hazards. (Updated 2018.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/faqs/abhr2/en/ .
  4. Hankscraft Inc. AeroGlove. (Updated 2018.). Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.aeroglove.com/.
  5. Vlock RS. Glove donning and removing machine. U.S. Patent 4,915,272. (Published Apr 10, 1990.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. http://www.google.com/patents/US4915272.
  6. National Public Radio. A copper bedrail could cut back on infections for hospital patients. (Published Dec 15, 2014.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2014/12/15/369931598 /a-copper-bedrail-could-cut-back-on-infections-for-hospital-patients.
  7. Copper Development Association Inc. Chile's oldest hospital uses oldest metal to protect youngest patients against harmful bacteria. (Published Jun 17, 2015.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. http://thinkcopper.org/healthcare/chiles-oldest-hospital-uses-oldest-metal-to-protect-yo ungest-patients/.
  8. Gupta D. "Meet and greet and then treat" is no fun: Is it time to reinvent no-touch greetings for contact precautions? Indian Journal of Community Health. 2015 Mar;27(1):171-172. Accessed Feb 7, 2018. http://ww w.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/09717587/2015/00000027/00000001/art00031.
  9. Inverse Innovation. The perfect robot starts with human-like hands. (Published Apr 26, 2017.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.inverse.com/article/30753- robot-human-hand.
  10. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Asthma: The Hygiene Hypothesis. (Updated May 31, 2017.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://ww w.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ResourcesforYou/Consumers/ucm167471.htm.
  11. The Joint Commission. Update: Citing Observations of Hand Hygiene Noncompliance. (Published Dec 12, 2017.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Update_Citing_Observations_of_Hand_Hygiene_N oncompliance.pdf.
  12. Arbogast JW, et al. Impact of a Comprehensive Workplace Hand Hygiene Program on Employer Health Care Insurance Claims and Costs, Absenteeism, and Employee Perceptions and Practices. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jun;58(6):e231-240.
  13. Medscape. The Hygiene Hypothesis - Redefine, Rename, or Just Clean It Up? (Published Apr 6, 2015.) Accessed Feb 7, 2018. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/842500.< /li>
  14. Gupta D. Pathogens being replaced with allergens or immunogens: a theoretical perspective. Indian Journal of Community Health. 2013 Jun;25(4);498-499. Accessed Feb 7, 2018. http://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/514.
  15. Behroozy A, Keegel TG. Wet-work Exposure: A Main Risk Factor for Occupational Hand Dermatitis. Saf Health Work. 2014 Dec;5(4):175-180.

Figures


Figure 1: Schematic Representation of Auto-Glove Dispenser

http://www.webmedcentral.com/articlefiles/tt1.png

 

Figure 2: Schematic Representation of Auto-Glove Remover

http://www.webmedcentral.com/articlefiles/tt2.png

 

 

Source(s) of Funding


NONE

Competing Interests


NONE

Reviews
1 review posted so far

Save The Hands While Saving From Hands.
Posted by Anonymous Reviewer on 16 May 2018 05:21:58 PM GMT Reviewed by WMC Editors
This review will not be counted towards final review score for this article and for its inclusion into WebmedCentral Peer Reviewer articles because review was posted by an anonymous reviewer.

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)