Research articles
 

By Dr. Vnr Kompalli Pratap , Dr. Mallika Mahalakshmi
Corresponding Author Dr. Mallika Mahalakshmi
Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Dept of Oral Medicine, - India 522001
Submitting Author Dr. Pratap V Kompalli
Other Authors Dr. Vnr Kompalli Pratap
Mammatha Dental College, Department of Public Health Dentistry, kothapet,guntur - India 522001

DENTISTRY

Oral health, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, India, Khammam.

Kompalli Pratap V, Mahalakshmi M. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Of School Children and Teachers Of Khammam towards Oral Hygiene. WebmedCentral DENTISTRY 2013;4(2):WMC004021
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2013.004021

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 11 Feb 2013 11:30:03 AM GMT
Published on: 12 Feb 2013 02:00:49 PM GMT

Abstract


Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the knowledge,attitude and practices of school children and school teachers towards oral hygiene, oral health and also to assess the dentition status in school children in rural and urban areas of Khammam.

Materials and methods: In the present study 700school  students of age group 9-15 years and 100 teachers were included.data on oral health KAP from school students and teachers were collected by giving  a close ended questionnaire consisting of 24 and 31 pre tested questions respectively.

Results: The results of this study show that most of the teachers (98%) said oral health played an important role in general health, whereas only 72.28% of students agreed with this.Most of the teachers (50%) said that brushing regularly, mouth rinsing and regular visit to the dentist will help in preventing dental problems, whereas the majority (28%) of the students answered that brushing regularly prevents dental problems. A maximum number of teachers (93%) said that they knew a clean mouth prevents dental decay, whereas only 73.28% students knew it. A total of 66% of the teachers and 56.85% of students did not know what flossis. A majority of teachers (69%) and 51.42% of students have visited the dentist.Most of the students visited the dentist when they had dental pain.More than 50% of the teachers cleaned their teeth twice daily (62%). Very few (3%) cleaned their teeth after every meal. It was found that 40%of the children brush twice daily.Majority of students used other oral hygiene aids like mouthwash and dental floss. Among children the mean “DMF-T” was 2.68 and the mean ‘D’ was 0.14, the mean ‘M’ was 0.14 and the mean ‘F’ was 0.15.

Conclusions: Results of the present study suggest that the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of school children were less than satisfactory, whereas among school teachers it was found to be just satisfactory.This clearly shows that there is a need to improve the knowledge of school children in particular and school teachers in general. This can be achieved by conducting regular oral health education camps in all the schools and also a large number of community based oral health camps.

Introduction


Indian economy is the world’s tenth largest by nominal GDP. India contains the largest concentration of people living below the World Bank’s international poverty line. 1 In India in general and in particular the deprived communities which suffer the most in the society and so have the most need, have a few option of resources. This holds very true even in dentistry in a country like India. The deprived and thereby disadvantaged social groups have a higher portion of teeth or tooth surfaces with unmet need for treatment when compared to the population of higher class2. School teachers have a lot to do with oral health education programs at school levels in their localities. Schools are found to be a very good option with high capacity of being supportive of programs involving preventive health and preventive dentistry for children3. In India the proportion of children aged 12 - 15 with any known dental decay was higher among lower social classes. This happens in India because 68.84% of them, which accounts for the majority of the population, live in rural areas. (As per census 0f 2011)4. There are multiple reasons for these children to be more susceptible to dental diseases which include social, economic and demographic factors like lack of awareness, lack of transportation, limited access to professional dental care, lack of perceived need for dental care and lack of all the more basic resources. 2 Oral health knowledge is considered to be an essential prerequisite for health-related practices5, and studies have shown that there is an association between increased knowledge regarding oral hygiene and better oral health. Oral hygiene is considered to be the most important factor in prevention of oral diseases6.Those who have assimilated the knowledge and feel a sense of personal control over their oral health are more likely to adopt self-care practices. Developing such a knowledge plays a key role in improving the oral health of the rural population. In the present study ORAL HEALTH PROMOTION through Oral Health Education to School Students and Teachers are utilized in an integrated manner for providing services to a selected rural and urban  population of Khammam district.

Objectives: To assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of school children and school teachers towards oral hygiene, oral health and also to assess the dentition status in school children. Children should be made aware of proper techniques of oral hygiene maintenance measures through their school teachers, thus making it a self-sustaining program.

Methods


Khammam is the headquarters of Khammam district in Andhra Pradesh state of India. Recently, AP Govt has announced Khammam city as Municipal Corporation, adding 14 villages around it which developed in business with the town7. Khammam has an average literacy rate of 82.59%, greater than the national average of 74.04% with male literacy of 87.94% and female literacy of 77.39%. In Khammam, 11% of the population are under 6 years of age7.

Sample size and sampling procedure: Mamata Dental College and the hospital are a well-known institution in India and are located in the heart of Khammam city. The majority of field activities of Mamata dental college and hospitals on improvement of oral health of population focus on places, in and around Khammam. Even though the college is serving the population of rural Khammam, the prevalence of untreated carious lesions is still high, especially in children. Initially the list of all the schools in Khammam was obtained from the DDPI office and selected schools from various places in the district were included in the study. Children in the age group range of 9-15 years were included in the study because the treatment needs are high in the permanent dentition. Permit to implement the study was obtained from the concerned authorities, gram Panchayats of Khammam, school headmasters, school teachers and parents of school children. The study was systematically scheduled to spread over a period of 2 months starting from the 0ctobeer 8, 2012. Even though a detailed scheduled plan was prepared well in advance few adjustments and changes had to be made while working it out practically. Voluntary informed consent was obtained from the parents of selected school children and the school teachers before administering the questionnaire and examining.

Methods of obtaining data: The required data for conducting the study was collected and recorded using a printed questionnaire pro forma. A structured questionnaire pro forma was used. This questionnaire in English script was translated into Telugu script (Local language), So that it could be used conveniently during field work. The questionnaire was pilot tested for feasibility and validity. A few modifications were done and the final Proforma was designed. In the present study 700 students and 100 teachers were given a close ended questionnaire consisting of 24 and 31 pre tested questions respectively. A pilot study was conducted on 50 individuals in Thimmaraopeta of Khammam in order to check the feasibility and the clarity of the questions in the pro forma. Few modifications in the questionnaire in terms of rephrasing, certain additions and deletions were done before finalizing the questionnaire. Sufficient numbers of instruments (mouth mirror, straight probe, explorer and tweezers, WHO CPI probe) and required amount of material (gloves, cotton rolls and face mask) were made available to have smooth uninterrupted examination.The examiner used disposable mouth masks and gloves during examination. The sterilization of the instruments was done using both chemical and physical methods. At the end of the day’s clinical examination, the instruments were sterilized in an autoclave.

Implementation Of the Study: Oral examination of school children was done by seating each subject on a chair under daylight using required instruments. The investigator applied dentition status and treatment need index to asses caries experience and the data were recorded in the specially prepared pro forma. The knowledge, attitudes and practices of selected school children and teachers towards oral health was recorded by using the structured questionnaire in local language

Results


A survey was conducted, to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of all the school children belonging to 9-15 years of age towards oral hygiene practices and oral health. The school children were also screened for their caries experience using Dentition status and treatment need index.
A total of 700 school children aged 9-15yrs were screened. The mean “DMF-T” was 2.68 and the mean ‘D’ was 0.14, the mean ‘M’ was 0.14 and the mean ‘F’ was 0.15. 100 school teachers between 20 and 58 years, from both rural and urban areas of Khammam were assessed for their knowledge, attitude and practices towards oral hygiene and oral health using a questionnaire. They were later provided oral health education and post-interventional evaluation was done using the same questionnaire to know the effect of oral health education. The knowledge attitude and practices (KAP) of school children were found to be less than satisfactory when the data from the questionnaire were subjected to qualitative assessment whereas among school teachers it was found to be just satisfactory. Post educational intervention KAP assessment showed improvement in their oral health awareness.

Knowledge: Table 1 presents the knowledge of school students and teachers. Most of the teachers (98%) said oral health played an important role in general health, whereas only 72.28% of students agreed with this. Most of the teachers (41%) said that irregular tooth brushing causes stains on the teeth; whereas 35.71% of students said that irregular tooth brushing causes bad breath. Most of the teachers (50%) said that brushing regularly, mouth rinsing and regular visit to the dentist will help in preventing dental problems, whereas the majority (28%) of the students answered that brushing regularly prevents dental problems. A maximum number of teachers (93%) said that they knew a clean mouth prevents dental decay, whereas only 73.28% students knew it. 50% of the teachers and 43.57% of students used fluoridated toothpaste.27% of the teachers and 22.14% of students used non-fluoridated toothpaste and the remaining didn’t know whether they used fluoridated tooth paste or not. A total of 66% of the teachers and 56.85% of students did not know what floss is. After health education everybody learnt how to use floss. 66% of the teachers said that regular cleaning of the mouth can prevent all the listed dental problems.Among students 30% of them said that regular cleaning of mouth prevents bad smell.

Attitudes:Table 2 presents the attitudes  towards oral health.99% of teachers and 92% 0f students said that maintaining a healthy mouth is an individual responsibility.88% teacher and 53.85% students said that improving and maintaining oral health is in their control. After health education even the remaining came to the same opinion.A majority of teachers (69%) and 51.42% of students have visited the dentist.

Practices: Table 3 presents the responses to questions relating to practice. The majority of the teachers said that they used tooth brush and tooth paste to clean their teeth. After health education rest of them understood that it's not healthy to use any other older  means of cleaning the teeth. More than 50% of the teachers cleaned their teeth twice daily (62%). Very few (3%) cleaned their teeth after every meal.Most of the teachers brushed their teeth both in horizontal and vertical strokes. 69% of the total individuals changed their brush once in 3 months. After health education they appreciated the loss of efficiency due to fraying of the bristles. The majority (77%) of teachers said that they rinse their mouth after meals. Almost all the teachers answered that they will clean their tongue regularly. 84% of them said that they use a tongue cleaner to clean their tongue. 67% of the teachers used mouthwash in addition to regular usage of brush and toothpaste.

General: Table 4 summarizes the results for general questions regarding oral health and hygiene to teachers. 64%were not trained to give education on topics related to teeth and mouth.
A majority of them (60%) said that they provide oral health education to school children through health talks.

Discussion: This study assessed the knowledge, attitude and practices of selected school children and school teachers towards oral hygiene and oral health in  rural and urban areas of Khammam. In the present study 700 students and 100 teachers were given  a close ended questionnaire consisting of 24 and 31 pre tested questions respectively. After health education majority of the teachers appraised the role of all  effects of irregular tooth brushing. After health education majority of the teachers and students came to know that toothpaste contains fluoride and the anti-cariogenic property with fluorides help in reducing dental decay. Most of the students visited the dentist when they had dental pain, which is in accordance with the report by WHO (2008) 8 . Almost all of them opined that it is required to visit a dentist periodically to maintain the health of teeth. It was found that 40%of the children brush twice daily. This was very much higher when compared to other studies(Punitha et al2) and is nearly in accordance with the study by Harikiran et al,5 Where it was 38.5% and WHO study where it was 49%. A significant number of school children though were using tooth brush were not aware of its importance and exact method of using them. After providing oral health education children were found to have gained better knowledge. After health education they came to know that brushing after every meal is more beneficial. The majority of students used other oral hygiene aids like mouthwash and dental floss. This is in accordance with Lorna Carnerroet al9. Although they had poor knowledge most of the teachers provide oral health education to their children. This is in accordance with Ehizele et al10.Teachers wanted more information about oral health and were in favor of including topics related to oral health in the school curriculum.

Conclusion(s)


Results of the present study suggest that the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of school children were less than satisfactory, whereas among school teachers it was found to be just satisfactory. This clearly shows that there is a need to improve the knowledge of school children in particular and school teachers in general. School teachers can serve as a better way of educating students regarding oral health care,as they play a major role in developing the student’s personality.Parents should also be made aware of their child’s oral hygiene condition and the necessary precautionary measures.

This can be achieved by conducting regular oral health education camps in all the schools and also a large number of community based oral health camps. Efforts must be put in including oral health and hygiene related topics in the school curriculum at a more deeper level.

References


1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India
2. VC Punitha. P Sivaprakasam. Oral hygiene status, knowledge, attitude and practices of oral health among rural children of Kanchipuramdistrict.Indian journal of multidisciplinary dentistry, vol1, issue 2, Jan-Feb 2011.
3. Khalide Almas, Thamire M Al-Malik, Mohammed A Al-Shehri, Nilso Skaug. The knowledge and practices of oral hygiene methods and attendance pattern among school teachers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi medical journal 2003; Vol. (10):1087-1091
4. Census 2011 – Provisional Population Totals – India
5. HarikiranAG, Pallavi SK, SapnaHarirakash, Ashutosh, Nagesh KS. Oral health related KAP among 11-12 year old school children in a government aided missionary school of Bangalore city. Indian J Dent res, 19 (3) 2008.
6. Humagain M. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes and practices about oral health among secondary level students of rural Nepal. Webmed central dentistry 2011;2 (3): WMC001805.
7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khammam
8.CheahWhyeLian,TaySiowPhing,ChaiShiunChat,BongCheongShin,LuqmanulHakimBaharuddin,ZhuleikhaBainunJ alilCheJalil.Oral health knowledge, attitude and practice among secondary school students in Kuching, Sarawak Archives of Orofacial Sciences (2010), 5 (1): 9-16 9
9. Lorna Carneiro, 1 MsafiriKabulwa, 2 MathiasMakyao, 3 Good Luck Mrosso, 3 and Ramadhani Choum3.Oral Health Knowledge and Practices of Secondary School Students, Tanga, Tanzania. International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2011, Article ID 806258, 6 pages doi: 10.1155/2011/806258.
11. Ehizele HYPERLINK "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ehizele%20A%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21356031" A, Chiwuzie J, Ofili A. Oral health knowledge, attitude and practices among Nigerian primary school teachers. Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Nov; 9 (4): 254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00498.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
3 reviews posted so far

Review of Oral Hygiene in Khamam
Posted by Dr. Constantino Ledesma-Montes on 12 Mar 2013 01:38:28 AM GMT

Oral Hygiene in Khammam
Posted by Dr. William J Maloney on 12 Feb 2013 09:54:58 PM GMT

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)