Case Report

By Dr. Balasubramanian Thiagarajan , Prof. Venkatesan Ulaganathan
Corresponding Author Dr. Balasubramanian Thiagarajan
Department of otolaryngology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai Tamilnadu, Otolaryngology online, sreemagal, 20 officers colony rajaram metha nagar chennai India 600029 - India 600029
Submitting Author Dr. Balasubramanian Thiagarajan
Other Authors Prof. Venkatesan Ulaganathan
Otolaryngology Meenakshi Medical College, - India


Blow out fracture orbit, Endoscopic repair

Thiagarajan B, Ulaganathan V. Blow Out Fracture Orbit Endoscopic Reduction a Novel Management Modality. WebmedCentral OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY 2012;3(5):WMC003329
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.003329

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submitted on: 03 May 2012 05:10:43 PM GMT
Published on: 04 May 2012 06:04:30 PM GMT


Blow out fracture of orbit involves fracture of orbital floor without fracture of infraorbital rim. This injury is common from frontal blow to orbit. Frontal blow to orbit causes increased intraorbital tension causing fracture of floor of the orbit (weak point) with prolapse of orbital content into the maxillary sinus cavity. This causes enophthalmos and diplopia. Infraorbital rim is not involved in pure blow out fracture, it is also involved then it should be considered as an impure blow out fracture [3]. Entrapment of inferior rectus muscle between the fracture fragments will cause diplopia in these patients. This article discusses a novel endoscopic internal reduction of fractured fragments. Main advantage of endoscopic approach is the lack of facial skin incision. It is cosmetically acceptable.


Orbital floor fractures were first described by MacKenzie in Paris in 1884 [1]. Smith was the first to describe entrapment of inferior rectus between the fracture fragments. He was also the first to coin the term “Blow out fracture” [2]. Blow out fracture causes an increase in the intraorbital volume, this causes enopthalmos. Entrapment of inferior rectus muscle causes diplopia. These patients usually report to an opthalmologist since orbital signs and symptoms are predominant. Shere etal in their study conclude that nearly 14% of blow out fractures are caused by contact sports in a military population [4].

Case Report(s)

30 years old male patient came with complaints of:
1. Swelling right eye – 1 day duration
2. Double vision – 1 day duration
3. Bleeding from right nose – 1 day duration
History of injury on being struck by a cricket ball +
He gave no history of loss of consiousness.

On examination:
Swelling over upper and lower eyelids on the right side +
Enopthalmos right eye +
Ocular movements restricted on right gaze
Diplopia +
Forced duction test +

CT scan nose and paranasal sinuses:
Showed evidence of blow out fracture right orbit. Tear drop sign could be seen.

Reduction was performed via Caldwel Luc approach under endoscopic guidance. 4 mm 30 degree nasal endoscope was used for this purpose. Trap door fractures can usually be reduced without resorting to prosthesis. Since this patient had a trap door fracture it could be easily reduced under endoscopic guidance. The reduced fracture fragment was stabilized by inflating the balloon of foley's catheter introduced into the maxillary sinus via inferior meatal antrostomy. Foley's catheter is left in place for a period of 2 weeks for union to occur.


Orbital blow out fracture is commonly caused by blunt trauma to the orbit. This is commonly seen in persons involved in contact sports like boxing, foot ball, rugby etc [5].

Two theories attempt to explain this injury phenomenon:
1. Buckling theory
2. Hydraulic theory

Buckling theory:
This theory proposed that if a force strikes at any part of the orbital rim, these forces gets transeferred to the paper thin weak walls of the orbit (i.e. floor and medial wall) via rippling effect causing them to distort and eventually to fracture. This mechanism was first described by Lefort [3].

Hydraulic theory [6]:
This theory was proposed by Pfeiffer in 1943. This theory believes that for blow out fracture to occur the blow should be received by the eye ball and the force should be transmitted to the walls of the orbit via hydraulic effect. So according to this theory for blow out fracture to occur the eye ball should sustain direct blow pushing it into the orbit.
Water House [7] in 1999 did a detailed study of these two mechanisms by applying force to the cadaveric orbit. He infact used fresh unfixed cadavers for the investigation. He described two types of fractures:

Type I: A small fracture confined to the floor of the orbit (actually mid medial floor) with herniation of orbital contents in to the maxillary sinus. This fracture was produced when force was applied directly to the globe (Hydraulic theory).

Type II: A large fracture involving the floor and medial wall with herniation of orbital contents. This type of fracture was caused by force applied to the orbital rim (Buckling theory).

Initial signs and symptoms of blow out fracture include:
1. Immediate swelling of the eye
2. Tenderness over involved orbit
3. Pain and difficulty with eye movements
4. Double vision
5. Enopthalmos
6. Numbness / tingling over lower eyelid, nose, upper lip [8]

Complications of blow out fracture:
1. Herniation of orbital fat into maxillary sinus [9]
2. Orbital emphysema [10]
3. Bleeding into maxillary sinus
4. Entrapment / rupture of ocular muscles
5. Ischaemic muscle contractures [11]
6. Cellulitis
7. Diplopia

Timing for surgical intervention:
This is highly controversial. Some of the authors prefer a waiting period of atleast 2 weeks for the oedema to resolve before proceeding with surgical reduction of the fracture. Early intervention is indicated only in white eyed blow out fracture which is common in children. In children the bones are flexible and does not break easily but bends. Significant amounts of orbital tissue may get entrapped in between the fractured fragments causing a compromise in their blood supply. This condition is known as the white eyed blow out fracture. These patients should under go immediate reduction. Surgery is indicated if the eye has recessed by more than 2 mm into the ortbit, ocular movements restricted, persistence of diplopia.

Advantages of endoscopic approach: [12]
1. Accurate fracture visualization
2. Incisions are small
3. Facial incisions can be avoided
4. Minimal soft tissue dissection
5. Hospital stay minimized
6. Cosmetically acceptable


1. Ng P, Chu C, Young N, Soo M. Imaging of orbital floor fractures. Australas Radiol. Aug 1996;40(3):264-8
2. Smith B, Regan WF Jr. Blow-out fracture of the orbit; mechanism and correction of internal orbital fracture.Am J Ophthalmol. Dec 1957;44(6):733-9
4. Shere JL, Boole JR, Holtel MR, Amoroso PJ. An analysis of 3599 midfacial and 1141 orbital blowout fractures among 4426 United States Army Soldiers, 1980-2000. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:164-170.
5. Burm JS, Chung CH, Oh SJ. Pure orbital blowout fracture: new concepts and importance of medial orbital blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1839-1849.
6. Rhee JS, Kilde J, Yoganadan N, Pintar F. Orbital blowout fractures: experimental evidence for the pure hydraulic theory. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4:98-101.
7. Waterhouse N, Lyne J, Urdang M, Garey L. An investigation into the mechanism of orbital blowout fractures. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:607-612.
8. Moore KL. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1992.
9. Gilbard SM. Management of orbital blowout fractures: the prognostic significance of computed tomography. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;6:269-280
10. Kaiser PK, Friedman NJ, Pineda R. The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Illustrated Manual of Opthalmology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2004
11. Lisman RD, Smith BC, Rodgers R. Volkmann’s ischemic contractures and blowout fractures. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;7:117-131.
12. Ikeda K, Suzuki H, Oshima T, Takasaka T. Endoscopic endonasal repair of orbital floor fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1999;125(1):59-63.

Source(s) of Funding

This article did not receive any external funding

Competing Interests

Authors dont have any competing interest


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.


Author Comments
0 comments posted so far


What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)