Case Report
 

By Dr. Mohamed H Benazzouz , Dr. Faycal Bennani , Prof. Hachem El Sayegh , Prof. Ali Iken , Prof. Yassine Nouini , Prof. Lounis Benslimane , Prof. Mohamed Faik
Corresponding Author Dr. Mohamed H Benazzouz
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco
Submitting Author Dr. Mohamed H Benazzouz
Other Authors Dr. Faycal Bennani
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

Prof. Hachem El Sayegh
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

Prof. Ali Iken
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

Prof. Yassine Nouini
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

Prof. Lounis Benslimane
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

Prof. Mohamed Faik
Urologie A Hopital Avicenne, - Morocco

UROLOGY

Bladder, Large-cell, Neuro-endocrine carcinoma, Cancer

Benazzouz MH, Bennani F, El Sayegh H, Iken A, Nouini Y, Benslimane L, et al. Primary Large-Cell Neuro-Endocrine Carcinoma of the Bladder: The Study of Two Cases with the Literature Review. WebmedCentral UROLOGY 2012;3(3):WMC003138
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.003138

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 05 Mar 2012 08:56:32 PM GMT
Published on: 07 Mar 2012 09:03:48 PM GMT

Abstract


Primary large-cell neuro-endocrine carcinoma of the bladder is a rare aggressive tumor with a very poor prognosis. The authors report two new cases of primary large-cell neuro-endocrine carcinoma of the bladder and discuss the pathological and therapeutic aspects of this tumor in the light of a review of the literature

Introduction


Neuroendocrine tumors can grow in all organs containing epithelia, moreover they are frequently encountered in respiratory and gastrointestinal tract. These tumors are subdivided into small cell carcinomas, typical carcinoid, atypical ones, and large cell carcinomas. These tumors represent less than 1% of all bladder tumors. At this level, they are represented mainly by small cell carcinomas. Large cell carcinoma of the bladder are extremely rare. Only seven cases have been reported in English literature so far. These tumors with high metastatic potential and poor prognosis, require immediat aggressive treatment. We report two cases of primary large-cell neuro-endocrine carcinoma of the bladder and we discuss it from the clinical, the pathological and the therapeutical perspective.

Case Report(s)


Case 1 :

GA, age 74, chronic smoker, who had a surgery in 1981 for peritonitis with perforated ulcer, admitted in our training for terminal hematuria with blood clots associated with irritative symptoms of the low urinary tract. Clinical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory tests were normal. The ultrasound showed an echo pattern process tissue of 3 cm located in the antero upper face of the bladder. Cystoscopy found a tumor of the anterior side with a non-papillary necrosis appearence. We performed a transurethral resection of the tumor. The pathological examination was in favor of infiltrating neuroendocrine large cell carcinoma. A further immunohistochemical study confirmed this diagnosis with:

- ACL antibodies: positive

- anti-chromogranin antibodies: marking rather diffuse

- synaptophysin antibodies: intense and diffuse staining

A thoracoabdominal and pelvic CT was performed as a staging and was unremarkable. The patient was subsequently sent to the oncology department for chemotherapy based on cysplatine and gemcitabine. He died two months later.

Case 2 :

B.N., aged 54 years, medically treated since 1977 with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants for a complicated lupus, admitted in our training to support a massive hematuria lasting for two months. Examination found the patient in poor general condition, presenting a slightly discolored conjunctiva with cushinoïde aspect. The abdomen is soft with the presence of a palpable, hard, hypogastric mass. The biological tests found an anemia with normal renal function. Ultrasound objective an echo pattern process tissue located on the bladder floor without repercussions on the upper urinary tract. Endoscopy found a tumor in the trigone and in the right and left sides of the trigone with a non-papillary necrosis appearance. The patient therefore underwent a transurethral resection of the tumor considered to be complete by the operator. Pathological examination was in favor of a poorly differentiated carcinoma process (figure 1). Immunohistochemical complement was in favor of a neuro endocrine large cell carcinoma of the bladder with:

- chromogranin antibodies: positive(figure 2)

- synaptophysin antibodies: positive(figure 3)

- CK 7 Antibodies: negative

A thoracoabdominal and pelvic CT, as a staging, performed three weeks later  objective a circumferential thickening of the bladder wall with a  bilateral ureterohydronephrosis and presence of several lung nodules suggestive of secondary localization. The patient was subsequently sent to the medical oncology department for chemotherapy based on cysplatine and gemcitabine. She died before starting the first course from pulmonary embolism.

Discussion


Neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder are rare. Morphological criteria for neuroendocrine tumors are similar to those of other locations and are: organoid disposal and endocrinoïde vascularization; the criteria for distinguishing between these tumors are the presence or absence of necrosis, mitotic count and cell size. The cells composing these tumors are characterized by the expression of immunohistochemical markers of neuroendocrine differentiation [1]. The large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a clinical-pathological entity originally proposed in 1991 by Travis [2]. These carcinomas are more  often described in the lungs, although other localizations have been described such as the cervix, thymus, stomach and parotid gland. Histologically, it differs from small cell carcinomas by the large size of cells, a low volume ratio of nucleus and cytoplasm and frequent nucleoli [3]. The cells are large (nucleus> 33 mm or 3 small lymphocytes), the  architecture is trabecular, solid or pseudo-rosette, sometimes with palisading. The mitotic activity is high (greater than 10 mitoses per 10 fields at high magnification). There are pockets of extensive necrosis and the tumor tends to be diffusely invasive. The immunohistochemical study confirmed the diagnosis by showing an expression of neuroendocrine classic markers such as the NSE, CD56, chromogranin A and synaptophysin [4]. To our knowledge, 13 cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder have been reported in the literature. However, as the entity of the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is not well established, it is possible that some cases have been recognized and have not been diagnosed as variants of neuroendocrine tumors. Indeed, Quek reported that about 25 cases of neuroendocrine tumors collected at their institution, five were found to be large cell carcinomas when the specimens were reviewed retrospectively [5].

These large cell carcinomas can be pure or composite emerging in a urothelial carcinoma. The pure form of the tumor is defined by the presence of more than 90% of tumor cells that express a neuroendocrine differentiation. The histogenesis of primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the bladder is unknown. The difficulty lies in the fact that the bladder seems devoid of diffuse neuroendocrine system cells. Two hypothesis are proposed: the first suggests an origin from a totipotent stem cell transformation of normal urothelium [6,7], the second involves metaplasia of the normal urothelium or a dedifferentiation of a high grade transitional cell carcinoma [6, 8]. Five cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder reported  contained another contingent than the neuroendocrinien one which can plead for the first hypothesis. The two cases reported in our study are pure large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Almost all neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder are high grade of malignancy  carcinomas with a poor prognosis because of their high metastatic potential [6, 5, 8, 9, 10]. Treatment modalities (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) are not well defined because of the rarity of these tumors. However, several studies of large cell lung carcinoma reported a relatively high response rate to standard chemotherapy regimens used to treat small cell carcinoma. A potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has also been suggested. Thus, treatment of disseminated forms is based on chemotherapy with  platinum [10, 11]. If cons-indication or failure of chemotherapy, radiotherapy is the best option for symptomatic tumors. Treatment of localized forms has to take account of the high frequency of micro-metastasis and is based on a combination of chemotherapy to radical surgery or radio-chemotherapy [10].

The evolution of neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder is often unfavorably relevant to the clinical stage at the moment of diagnosis that is more often advanced. However, early diagnosis and prompt treatment involving cystoprostatectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy can help to obtain a long-term control of disease. Indeed Akamatsu had good results after combining surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide and carboplatin. The patient remained alive and did not recur after 14 months [3]. The two cases we reporte have a rapidly fatal evolution after diagnosis without the benefit of radical cystoprostatectomy, or full courses of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Conclusion


Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the bladder are rare, aggressive and often immediately metastatic. Only histological examination with immunohistochemical study of the resection materiel allows the diagnosis. The management is not codified given the small number of cases described in the literature.

References


1. SOLCIA E., KLÖPPEL G., SOBIN L.H. : Histological typing of neuroendocrine tumors. International histological classification of tumors. World Health Organization. Springer, New York, 2000 : 61-62.
2. Travis WD, Linnoila I, Tsokos MG, Hitchcock CL, Cutler GB, Nieman L. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1991; 15:529–53.
3. Shusuke Akamatsu, Sojun Kanamaru, Misa Ishihara, Takeshi Sano, Asaki Soeda and Kimio Hashimoto. Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder. International Journal of Urology (2008) 15, 1080–1083
4. HELPAP B. : Morphology and therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine tumors of the genitourinary tract. Cancer, 2002 ; 95 : 1415-1420.
5. Quek ML, Nichols PW, Yamzon J, Daneshmand S, Miranda G, Skinner DG. Radical cystectomy for primary neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder: The University of Southern California experience. J. Urol. 2005; 174: 93–6.
6. ABENOZA C., MANIVEL, SIBLEY R.K. : Adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differenciation of the urinary bladder. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 1986 ;110 : 1062-1066.
7. HELPAP B., KÖLLERMANN J. : Immunohistochemical analysis of the proliferative activity of neuroendocrine tumors from various organs. Are there indications for a neuroendocrine tumor-carcinoma sequence ? Virchows Arch., 2001 ; 438 : 86-91.
8. HAILEMARIAM S., GASPERT A., KOMMINOTH P., TAMBOLI P.,AMIN M. : Primary pure large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Mod. Pathol., 1998 ; 11 : 1016-1020.
9. EVANS A.J., AL-MAGHRABI J., TSIHLIAS J., LAJOIE G., SWEET J.M., CHAPMAN W.B. : Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 2002 ; 126 : 1229-1232.
10. VINCENDEAU S., DE LAJARTE-THIROUARD A.S., BENSALAH K., GUILLE F., LOBEL B., PATARD J.J. : Différenciation neuroendocrine des tumeurs de vessie. Prog. Urol., 2003 ; 13 : 375-384.
11. HELPAP B., KLÖPEL G.: Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the prostate and urinary bladder :a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Virchows Arch., 2002 ; 440 : 241-248.

Source(s) of Funding


none

Competing Interests


none

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
1 review posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)