Case Report
 

By Mr. Anthony Venyo , Dr. Sarang Shah , Dr. Niranjan Desai
Corresponding Author Mr. Anthony Venyo
Urology Department. North Manchester General Hospital, North Manchester General Hospital, Department of Urology, ManchesternM8 5RB, United Kingdom - United Kingdom M8 5RB
Submitting Author Mr. Anthony Kodzo - Grey Venyo
Other Authors Dr. Sarang Shah
North Manchester General Hospital Department of Urology, - United Kingdom

Dr. Niranjan Desai
North Manchester General Hospital Department of Urology, - United Kingdom

UROLOGY

Anterior Sacral Meningocele, Currarino triad, Hydronephrosis, Displaced Bladder, Abdominal distension

Venyo A, Shah S, Desai N. An Unusual Presentation of Anterior Sacral Meningocele: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. WebmedCentral UROLOGY 2011;2(10):WMC002308
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002308
No
Submitted on: 15 Oct 2011 04:14:13 PM GMT
Published on: 16 Oct 2011 08:34:20 AM GMT

Abstract


Background
Anterior Sacral Meningocele (ASM) is an extremely rare congenital anomaly which most medical practitioners may never come across in their life time. A rare case of Anterior Sacral Meningocele is reported with a review of the literature.
Case Report
A 31-years-old man was referred with an 8 month history of gradual abdominal distension. He was asymptomatic otherwise. He was found on examination to have a massive distension of his abdomen and his umbilicus was pushed-up. Dilated visible veins were observed in his groins. Abdominal palpation revealed a huge mass in the supra-pubic region extending up to the umbilical region. He had CT scan and MRI Scan which revealed: bilateral severe hydronephrosis and an anterior sacral defect affecting the distal sacrum, a huge, homogeneous cyst without enhancement diagnostic of anterior sacral meningocele arising out of the pelvis and extending into the abdomen and in continuity with the sacral defect. The diagnosis of Anterior Sacral Meningocele was established with CT scan and MRI Scan and the patient was referred to the Regional NeuroSurgical Centre Literature review revealed that a concave defect in the side of the sacrum (scimitar shaped sacrum) on plain x-ray of the pelvis is often diagnostic but CT scan and MRI scan would confirm the diagnosis. The goal of treatment of ASM is the obliteration of communication between the spinal sub-arahnoid space and the meningocele.
Conclusion
CT scan and MRI Scan are useful radiological methods by which the diagnosis of Anterior Sacral Meningocele can be confirmed.
Key Words:
Anterior Sacral Meningocele, Currarino triad, Hydronephrosis, Displaced Bladder, Abdominal distension.


Introduction


Anterior Sacral Meningocele (ASM) is a rare congenital anomaly which was first described in 1837 by Bryant1.2 Anterior Sacral Meningocele is a unilocular or multilocular extension or herniation of the dura mater and arachnoid out of the sacral spinal canal through a defect in the sacrum into the retroperitoneum and infraperitoneal space, either anteriorly through the body of the sacrum or anterolaterally through an enlarged intervertebral foramen or coalesced foramina. It contains Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which in some reported cases, has been discoloured (slightly yellow), and has had an elevated protein content. It may also contain neural tissue2.3.4.
Most cases usually occur before the third decade of life5. The incidence of a posterior meningocele has been reported to be about 1/ 1,000 live births, but, the actual incidence of Anterior Sacral Meningocele is unknown due to the asymptomatic characteristics5. Since it was first described by Bryant, only approximately 245, cases of ASM have been reported in the world literature5, 6, 7-20.
Even though Anterior Sacral Meningocele occurs sporadically, its inheritance has been proposed to be autosomal dominant or x-linked dominant.14. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26.
Anterior Sacral Meningocele has been stated to be more common in females, ranging from a male to female ratio of 1:4 to 31:116.2, 3, 4, &10.
In view of the fact that Anterior Sacral Meningocele is an uncommon condition, the diagnosis could be missed easily by the unaccustomed practitioner. A case of an Anterior Sacral Meningocele in an adult male which was inadvertently missed after ultrasonography is reported with a review of the literature.

Case Report


A 31 year old man was referred from another hospital with an 8 month history of gradual abdominal distension. There was no history of weight loss, anorexia, nausea or vomiting. He also did not have urinary or bowel disturbances. He did not have any significant past medical history.
On inspection he was found to have massive distension of abdomen mainly involving the lower part of the abdomen. The umbilicus was pushed up. All quadrants of the abdomen moved equally with respiration. Dilated veins were visible in both groins. On palpation there was evidence of a huge mass in the supra-pubic region extending up to the umbilical region, non tender, non mobile, dull on percussion. On auscultation the bowel sounds were present. His rectal examination did not reveal any abnormality. The systemic examination was normal.
The provisional radiological diagnosis based upon the CT scan was: bilateral hydronephrosis and polycystic right kidney with a huge right renal cyst. The bilateral hydronephrosis was considered to be due to the large intra abdominal and intra pelvic cyst.
The radiology consisted initially of CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast injection and scanning in the portal venous phase. The initial scannogram was typical of a sacral defect affecting the distal sacrum but greater involvement of the right side. The subsequent scan showed bilateral severe hydronephrosis particularly severe on the right with severe cortical thinning of the right kidney. Arising out of the pelvis and extending into the abdomen was a huge homogeneous cyst without any enhancement or septation. The Hounsfield unit measurement was between -5 and 20. The ureters were displaced anteriorly indicating that the cyst must be retroperitoneal and posteriorly placed. The urinary bladder was displaced anteriorly and to the left of midline. There was a large anterior defect of the sacrum as well as absence of the distal sacrum. The cyst was in communication with the sacral defect and therefore diagnosed as representing anterior sacral meningocele. (See figures 1, 2 & 3 which respectively show: the meningocele; bilateral hydronehrosis and the meningocele; the displaced bladder, the Anterior Sacral Meningocele and the sacral defect). The sigmoid colon was stretched over the under surface of the meningocele. No other abnormalities were detected in the rest of the abdomen.
Following this an MRI scan was also performed. The MRI scan of the spine showed no abnormalities of the cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebrae or the cord and a huge anterior meningocele. (See figures 4, 5 & 6). There was also cerebellar tonsilar herniation representing the type 1 Chiari malformation due to a large sacral defect.
In view of the CT scan and MRI scan confirmation of the presence of Anterior Sacral Meningocele, the neurosurgeons accepted the patient with a provisional plan to repair the meningocele by the anterior approach.

Discussion


Anterior Sacral Meningocele is an uncommon congenital malformation usually associated with sacrococcygeal bony defect. Anterior Sacral Meningocele is a lesion, which consist of a cerebro-spinal fluid sac in the pelvic cavity communicating by subarachnoid fistula through the sacral defect. It is recognised within the heritable Currarino triad, consisting of congenital anal stenosis, scimitar sacrum and a presacral mass (the ASM7, 20, 35.)
However, Anterior Sacral Meningocele may exist without the presence of anal stenosis. Anterior Sacral Meningocele has been associated with a variety of congenital abnormalities of the pelvis. Some of these abnormalities include: anorectal malformations, dermoid cysts, sacrococcygeal teratoma and lipomata, duplication of urogenital tracts as well as epidermoid tumours 2, 4, 36, 37. A number of reports have shown some association with (a) Marfan syndrome 10, 27-30 and with (b) neurofibromatosis2, 28. 
Even though Anterior Sacral Meningocele can present at any age, it usually occurs in the second or third decades and child bearing years in females; but in males it is usually diagnosed in the first decade 2, 3, 4, 8, 38.
Patients’ symptoms are usually attributable to a pelvic mass (for example, chronic constipation, urinary incontinence, and dysmenorrhoea / dyspareunia) or chronic low back ache. 1, 4, 38, 39-43.
In females, Anterior Sacral Meningoceles have been reported to have caused problems in labour and they have caused obstructed labour which resulted in deliveries by caesarean section 44, 45.
Other presentations of Anterior Sacral Meningocele include:
a)Abdominal, gluteal, pelvic or groin masses. 1, 2, 3, 4 
b)Bacterial meningitis. 9, 46, 47, 48, 49.
c)Head aches. - Increased pressure headaches due to compression of the anterior sacral meningocele by increased abdominal pressure such as occurs during defaecation with emptying of the contents of the ASM back into the cerebro-spinal fluid spaces. On the other hand, low pressure head aches have also been reported when the patient stands and the ASM refills4.  
d)Local neurological symptoms in the form of sacral numbness, lower extremity paresthesia or difficulty of anal sphincter control11.
There is disagreement with regards to the presence or absence of spina bifida with Anterior Sacral Meningocele. Wilkins in 1996 stated that the association with spina bifida is rare but can be present, with Posterior Sacral Meningocele associated with Anterior Sacral Meningocele being rarer still2. Some authors are in agreement with Wilkins’ view 3 46  On the other hand others have stated that all cases of Anterior Sacral Meningocele are associated with spina bifida, at least in a paediatric population10.
With regards to radiological diagnosis, there is the general acceptance that a scimitar shaped sacrum (a concave defect in one side of the sacrum) is often diagnostic on plain radiography (plain X-ray of the pelvis).4, 35.  There is variation in the bone defects that have been associated with Anterior Sacral Meningocele ranging from an enlarged foramen to complete sacral agenesis2, 39.  Myelography, CT scan and MRI scan are useful in delineating the anatomy of the stalk and in planning of a surgical operation for the meningocele. CT scan and MRI are the investigation of choice46. The cord and the cauda equina have been reported to be usually normal 3, 40. It has nevertheless, been reported that there may be tethering and abnormalities of the nerve supply to the bladder 4, 39, 43. In our case CT scan and MRI scans clearly confirmed the diagnosis of Anterior Sacral Meningocele as well as bilateral hydronephrosis  (What was considered to be a huge renal cyst at the referring hospital was found to be rather a huge anterior sacral meningocele)..
Conservative management of Anterior Sacral Meningocele is limited to children, who are at high surgical risk, and to male patients affected with a small meningocele which doesn’t tend to enlarge and with no associated tumours14. Nevertheless, surgical closure is the treatment of choice, because Anterior Sacral Meningocele does not have spontaneous regression and generally progresses its enlargement with a corresponding increase in the risk of complications. In the surgical treatment care is required to avoid precipitating bacterial meningitis 2, 8, 31, 46. . The goal of the treatment of Anterior Sacral Meningocele is the obliteration of communication between the spinal subarachnoid space and the meningocele.  A posterior approach to perform a sacral laminectomy and tie off the neck of the Anterior Sacral Meningocele is favoured by some surgeons2, 12, 31, & 48.  Nevertheless, trans-abdominal (‘anterior abdominal approach’ with over-sewing of the neck of the meningocele)  and perineal approaches have been reported2, 16, 32,  33. Other surgical approaches that have been reported in the treatment of Anterior Sacral Meningocele include endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques6, 13, 30 & 34. It has been stated that meningocele excision is not deemed necessary2. Hino et al (1993) reported that failure to close the neck of the Anterior Sacral Meningocele resulted in a recurrence31.  It has also been reported that lumbo-peritoneal shunt insertion is an alternative treatment, which could improve the symptoms of the high-pressure sacral meningocele, especially in a large fistula with unsuccessful surgical closure5.

References


1.Bryant T, Case of deficiency of the anterior part of the sacrum with a thecal sac in the pelvis, similar to the tumor of spina bifida. Lancet 1837; 1: 258-360 
2.Wilkins R H. Lateral and anterior spinal meningoceles in Wilkins R H, Regachary SS eds Neurosurgery, 2nd Edn McGraw-Hill, New York 1996, 3521-3525.
3.Jabre A, Ball J B, Tew J M. Anterior sacral meningocele Current diagnosis. Surg Neurol 1985; 23: 9 - 13 
4.Villarejo F, Scavone C, Blazquez M G, Pasqual-Castroviejo I, Perez-Highueras A, Fernandez A, Garcia-Bertrand C. Anterior sacral meningocele: Review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1983; 19: 57 – 71
5.Rukskul P. Lumbo-peritoneal Shunting Improved Spinal Cord Compression Due to a Large Anterior Sacral Meningocele. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88: 265 - 268.
6.Clatterbuck R E, Jackman S V, Kavoussi L R, Long D M. Laparoscopic treatment of an anterior sacral meningocele. Case illustration. J Neurosurg Spine 2000; 92 (2) Suppl): 246.
7.Kuronski  M, Kurosaki M, Kamitani H, Anno Y, Watanabe T, Tomokatsu H, Yamasaki T. Complete familial Currarino triad. J Neurosurgery (Spine 1) 2001; 94: 158-161
8.Hanna A S, and Morandi X. Anterior sacral meningocele in pregnancy, J Neuro Surg (Spine 1) 2001; 94: 162- 164
9.Rigante D and Segui C. Anterior sacral meningocele in a patient with marfan syndrome. Clin Neuropathol 2001; 20: 70-72.
10.Buxton N, Bassi S and Firth J. Anterior sacral meningocele presenting as a peri-anal abscess. J. R. Coll. Edin., 2002; 47: 582 - 584
11.Singh S J, Rao P, Stockton V. Familial Presacral masses: screening pitfalls. J Paediatric Surgery 2001; 36: 1841 - 1844 
12.Tani S, Okuda Y, Abe T. Surgical Strategy for anterior sacral meningocele Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2003; 43: 204 - 209 
13.Jeon B C, Kim D H, Kwon K Y. Anterior endoscopic treatment of a huge anterior sacral meningocele; technical case report. Neurosurg 2003; 52: 1231-1233.
14.Massimi L, Calisti A, Koutzoglou M. et al, Giant anterior sacral meningocele and posterior sagittal approach, Childs Nerv syst 2003; 19: 722 - 728
15.Bal S, Kurtulmus S, Kocygit H, Gurgan A. A case with cauda equina syndrome due to bacterial meningitis of anterior sacral meningocele. Spine 2004; 29: 298 - 299
16.Tuzun Y, Izci Y, Polat K Y.  Anterior sacral meningocele: Excision by the Abdominal Approach  Pediatr Neurosurgery 2005; 41: 244 -2 47
17.Palomares M T  D L, Ruzo J S, Alvarez A M R M, Lopez J A Y, Milan M A V, Alvarez A M S M.  Submucous rectal mass and acute meningitis presentation of anterior sacral meningocele. Rev Esp Entern Dig 2005; 97: 756-757
18.Khan A K, Deb S, Ray D K, Nag B K. Thecoperitoneal shunt in a case of symptomatic Anterior Sacral Meningocele. Neurol India, 2004; 52: 403-404
19.Matsumoto H, Kohno K, Ishii D, Mitshuhara T, Yamaguchi Y, Kohno K. Currarino triad: a case report  No Shinkel Acka 2004;  729-732
20.Ilhan H, Tokar B, Atasoy M A, Kulali A. Diagnostic steps and staged operative approach in Currarino’s triad: a case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv syst. 2000; 16: 522 - 524
21.Andersen C, Tange M, Bjerre P. Anterior sacral meningocele occurring in one family. An autosomal dominantly inherited condition. Br J Neurosurg 1990; 4: 59 - 62
22.Lynch S A, Bond P M, Copp A J, A gene for autosomal dominant sacral agenesis maps to the holoprosencephaly region at 7q36. Nat Genet 1995; 11: 93 - 95
23.O’Riodan D S, O’Connell P R, Kirwan W O. Hereditary sacral agenesis with presacral mass and anorectal stenosis: the Currarino triad. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 536 - 538
24.Thomas M, Halaby F A, Hirschauer J S. Hereditary occurrence of anterior sacral meningocele: report of ten cases. Spine 1987; 12: 351- 354
25.Cohn J, Bay-Nielsen E. Hereditary defect of the sacrum and coccyx with anterior sacral meningocele. Acta Paediatr Scand 1969; 58: 268- 274
26.Klenerman L, Merrick M V: Anterior sacral meningocele in a family. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1973; 55: 331 - 334 
27.Voyvodic F, Scroop R, Sanders RR. Anterior sacral meningocele as a pelvic complication of Marfan syndrome. Aust N Z Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39: 362-363.
28.Schneider M B, Dittmar S, Boxer RA. Anterior sacral meningocele presenting as a pelvic/abdominal mass in a patient with Marfan syndrome. J Adolesc Health 1993; 14: 325 - 328.
29.Raftopoulos C, Deleluse F, Braude P, Rodesh C, Brotchi J.. Anterior sacral meningocele and Marfan syndrome: a review. Acta Chir Belg 1993; 93: 1 - 7.
30.Raftopoulos C, Pierrard G E, Retif C, Braude P, Brotchi J.. Endoscopic cure of a sacral meningocele associated with Marfan’s syndrome: case report. Neurosurgery 1992; 30: 765 - 768.
31.Hino A, Taketomo S, Iwanski T. Treatment of anterior sacral meningocele – case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1993; 33(10): 700 -702.
32.Sato K, Hayashi M, Kawano H, Kubota T, Node M, Fujita H, Nakagawara G.. Anterior sacral meningocele. Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1989; 29: 753 - 757.
33.Leibowitz E, Barton W, Sadighi P, Ross J S. Anterior sacral meningocele contiguous with a pelvic harmatoma. Case report. J Neurosurg 1984; 61: 188  – 190
34.Raftopoulos C, Baleriaux D, Hancq S, Closset J, David P, Brotchi J. Evaluation of endoscopy in the treatment of rare meningoceles: preliminary results. Surg Neurol 1995; 44: 308 - 317
35.Walton M, Bass J, Soucy P. Tettered cord with anorectal malformation, sacral anomalies and presacral masses; An under recognised association. Eur J Paediatr Surg 1995; 5: 59 - 62
36.Quigley MR, Schinco F, Brown J T. Anterior sacral meningocele with an unusual presentation. Case report, J Neurosurg 1984; 61: 790 - 792
37.Shamoto H, Yoshida Y, Shirane R, Yoshimoto T. Anterior sacral meningocele completely occupied by an epidermoid tumor. Child’s per thousand s Nerv Syst 1999; 15: 209 - 211.
38.Oren M, Laber B, Lee SH, Truex RC, Gennare A R. Anterior sacral meningocele: A report of five cases and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20: 492 - 5 
39.Amacher AL, Drake CG, McLachlin AD. Anterior sacral meningocele. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968; 126: 986 - 994
40.Jaffee R. Anterior sacral meningocele, report of a case. Obstet Gynecol 1966; 28: 684 - 686
41.Haddad FS. Anterior sacral meningocele: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Can J Surg 1958; 1: 230 - 242
42.Anderson FM. Occult spinal dysraphism: series of 73 cases. Pediatrics 1975; 55: 826 - 835
43.Anderson F M, Burke B L. Anterior sacral meningocele: A presentation of three cases. JAMA 1977; 237: 39 - 42
44.Johnston L H. Pregnancy associated with an anterior sacral meningocele : A case report. South Med J 1970; 63: 432- 434
45.Shidler F P, Richards V. Anterior sacral meningocele: Report of 3 cases. Ann Surg 1943; 118: 913 - 918
46.Fitzpatrick M O, Taylor W A S. Anterior sacral meningocele associated with a rectal fistula. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg (Spine) 1999; 91: 124 - 127
47.Blond M H, Borderon J C, Despert F, Laugier J, Maheut J, Robert M, Sirinhilli D. Anterior sacral meningocele associated with meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10: 783- 784.
48.Flumara F, Foti N, Gambardella A, Mazzeo A, Oliveri R L, Pagano V D, Quattrone A. Purulent meningitis due to spontaneous anterior sacral meningocele perforation. It  J Neurol Sci 1989; 10: 211- 213.
49.Somuncu S, Ariturk E, Iyigun O, Bernay F, Rizalar R, Gunaydin M, Gurses N. A case of anterior sacral menigocele excised using the posterior sagittal approach. J Paediatr Surg 1997; 32: 730- 732.

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
2 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)