Research articles

By Dr. Leonid Perlovsky , Dr. Arthur Goldwag
Corresponding Author Dr. Leonid Perlovsky
Harvard University, - United States of America
Submitting Author Dr. Leonid Perlovsky
Other Authors Dr. Arthur Goldwag
freelance writer, - United States of America


Jihadism, Arabic Language, Grammar, Cognitive Science, Culture, SWH

Perlovsky L, Goldwag A. The Grammatical Roots Of Jihadism: How Cognitive Science Can Help Us Understand The War On Terror. WebmedCentral PSYCHOLOGY 2011;2(2):WMC001581
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001581
Submitted on: 22 Feb 2011 02:11:09 AM GMT
Published on: 24 Feb 2011 09:20:55 PM GMT


Jihadism is psychologically connected to the grammar of Arabic language


It is one of the great mysteries of our time: What went wrong with Islamic culture? A thousand years ago, when Europe was just beginning to emerge from the Dark Ages, Islamic scientists, mathematicians, artists, and scholars were at the vanguards of their respective fields. Today, as Sunnis and Shias slaughter each other over grievances that were obscure in the seventh century, and both sects avow their undying hatred for the west, many Islamic countries seem as retrograde as they were once progressive.
Any numbers of reasons have been proposed, some sophisticated, some silly: “they hate our freedom,” “Crusaders, Colonialists and Zionists humiliated them for centuries,” “polygamy and sharia’s sexual mores deprive young men of outlets for their libidinal energies,” “Wahhabism,” “oil,” “Islamism.” But all of these explanations at best describe symptoms rather than the disease itself.


A different diagnosis is proposed here. The ultimate explanation for the impasse between Islam and the West can be traced to the different grammars of Semitic and Indo-European languages. In the 19th century, Wilhelm von Humboldt and Nietzsche suggested that philosophy moves along tracks created by languages; Bhartrihari expressed similar ideas in India in the 6th c. AD. In the 1930s the linguist Benjamin Whorf and the anthropologist Edward Sapir suggested that people who speak sufficiently different languages might also think and even behave in different ways. The new version of the Bhartrihari-Humboldt-Nietzsche-Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is concerned not so much with the relationship of grammar to cognition as to emotions. When Osama bin Laden thundered that “Being killed for God's cause is a great honor achieved by only those who are the elite of the nation. We love this kind of much as you like to live,” or when Saddam Hussein promised “the mother of all battles,” American listeners heard florid rhetoric; many Arab speakers felt their calls in their blood.
Noam Chomsky suggested that the ability to learn and use language is hard-wired in our brains. But Chomsky missed the importance of emotional contents of the different languages. “Meaning” embraces more than concepts: ideas resonate emotionally as well, and those emotions are inseparable from the sounds of the words that describe them. While concepts can be transferred from one language to another, not all of their emotional resonances can.


Because of the syntactical structure of Arabic, it is difficult to introduce new vocabulary and new ideas; old emotions and old ideas are inextricably bound together. If the advent of Islam initially lit up the Arab world, over time the limitations of the Arabic language would dampen and finally extinguish the intellectual and creative fire. Investing too many emotions in too few ideas is ultimately detrimental to the expansion of knowledge: it nails the mind to old ways. Thinking becomes more difficult than to blow up oneself.


In a recent column in The New York Times, Thomas Friedman quoted the Syrian-born poet Ali Ahmad Said, also known as Adonis. “The Arab individual is no less smart, no less a genius than anyone else in the world. He can excel—but only outside his society,” he told an interviewer on Dubai TV. “If I look at the Arabs, with all their resources and great capacities, and I compare what they have achieved over the past century with what others have achieved in that period, I would have to say that we Arabs are in a phase of extinction, in the sense that we have no creative presence in the world. We have the quantity,” he said. “We have the masses of people, but a people becomes extinct when it no longer has a creative capacity, and the capacity to change its world.”


The desire to understand our world is as basic a human instinct as our quest for food and shelter and our drive to reproduce ourselves. Both an attribute of civilization and a neurological function, language is something that all human beings have in common. But language is also one of the things that keeps us at odds with each other. The Semitic storytellers who thought up the tale of the Tower of Babel knew what they were talking about. 


1. Boroditsky, L. July 24, 2010. Lost in Translation, Wall Street Journal
2. Deutscher, G. August 26, 2010. Does Your Language Shape How You Think? NYTimes
3. Perlovsky, L.I. (2009b). Language and Emotions: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Neural Networks, 22(5-6); 518-526. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.034
4. Perlovsky, L.I. (2009). Language and Cognition. Neural Networks, 22(3), 247-257.doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.007.
5. Perlovsky, L.I. (2006). Toward Physics of the Mind: Concepts, Emotions, Consciousness, and Symbols. Phys. Life Rev. 3(1), pp.22-55. 
6. Perlovsky, L.I. (2001). Neural Networks and Intellect: using model- based concepts. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (3rd printing) . 
7. Perlovsky, L.I. (2009). ‘Vague-to-Crisp’ Neural Mechanism of Perception. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 20(8), 1363-1367.
8. Mayorga, R., Perlovsky, L.I., Eds. (2007). Sapient Systems. Springer, London, UK. 
9. Perlovsky, L.I., Kozma, R., Eds. (2007). Neurodynamics of Higher-Level Cognition and Consciousness. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. 
10. Perlovsky, L.I. (2006). Symbols: Integrated Cognition and Language. Chapter in Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development. Eds. R. Gudwin, J. Queiroz. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp.121-151. 
11. Perlovsky, L.I. (2006). Modeling Field Theory of Higher Cognitive Functions. Chapter in Artificial Cognition Systems, Eds. A. Loula, R. Gudwin, J. Queiroz. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp.64-105. 
12. Perlovsky, L.I. (2009a). Language and Cognition. Neural Networks, 22(3), 247-257.doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.007.
13. Perlovsky, L.I. (2009b). Language and Emotions: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Neural Networks, 22(5-6); 518-526. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.034
14. Perlovsky, L.I. (2010f). Jihadism and Grammars. Comment to “Lost in Translation,” Wall Street Journal, June 27,
15. Perlovsky, L.I. (2010g). Joint Acquisition of Language and Cognition; WebmedCentral BRAIN;1(10):WMC00994;
16. Perlovsky, L.I. (2010n). Languages and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (ESWH);
17. Whorf, B.L., Carroll, J.B. (Ed.). 1964. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.

Source(s) of Funding


Competing Interests



This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

2 reviews posted so far

0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.


Author Comments
0 comments posted so far


What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)