Case Report
 

By Dr. Iftikhar H Wani , Dr. Abdul Q Salaria , Dr. Masrat Jan
Corresponding Author Dr. Iftikhar H Wani
Emergency Hospital Orthopaedician, - India 192221
Submitting Author Dr. Iftikhar H Wani
Other Authors Dr. Abdul Q Salaria
ASCOMS, J & K, - India

Dr. Masrat Jan
SMHS Hospital Srinagar Kashmir, - India

ORTHOPAEDICS

Tarsal Tunnel syndrome, Ganglion cyst, Medial Planter Nerve.

Wani IH, Salaria AQ, Jan M. A Ganglion Cyst at the Foot Causing Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2012;3(1):WMC001130
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.001130

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 27 Jan 2012 04:59:48 PM GMT
Published on: 28 Jan 2012 10:25:48 AM GMT

Introduction


Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is caused by compression of the posterior tibial nerve as it passes through the posterior tarsal tunnel. It is much more common in the posterior tarsal tunnel than in the anterior by compression of the deep peroneal nerve as it passes beneath the superficial fascia of the ankle [1]. TTS may be associated with exacerbation of symptoms at night, by exercise or rest, or by elevating or lowering the extremity, and symptoms confined to the lateral planter nerve, medial planter nerve, or medial calcaneal nerve [2]. Failure to diagnose and treat neuropathies effectively can cause permanent neuropathic pain and functional disability In most cases, TTS develops from unknown causes and can be treated conservatively. However, early surgical intervention is mandatory when neuropathy arises from a progressing occult pathology to avoid, repeated steroid injections, prescription of several medication for neuropathic pain, and to prevent permanent neuropathic pain. MRI and electromyography, together with clinical history and physical examination, can help to make the differential diagnosis.

Case Report


The patient was a 31-year-old man with a 6-month history of pain, numbness, and paresthesia on the left great toe and the first metatarsal area in the sole. The pain was constant and burning. Symptoms were aggravated by pressure on the sole such as walking and weight bearing. Symptoms had initially localized in the great toe and sole but gradually extended to the second and third toes. Patient had been prescribed lot of local steroidal injections but had no permanent relief. A physical examination did not reveal specific abnormalities except a local tenderness just below and down to the medial malleolus over the foot. There was no palpable swelling. We then performed an MRI which revealed a unilocular, ganglion cyst around the medial planter nerve in the digitorum muscles of the foot. [Fig.1 and 2]. Nerve-conduction studies showed that conduction velocity was reduced in the right medial plantar nerve. There was no apparent weakness of the intrinsic muscles of the right foot, but a subtle T2 high signal change in the abductor hallucis and flexor digitorum brevis muscle was seen on MRI. We suspected subacute muscle denervation and planned the patient for surgery. Intra-operatively, ganglion cyst was found close to the medial planter nerve and after meticulous dissection nerve was freed from the ganglion cyst [Fig. 3 and 4]. After surgery two weeks later, the patient had dramatic response with improved symptoms.

Discussion


The most common cause of compression of the posterior tibial nerve around the tarsal tunnel is trauma to the ankle, but any occult pathology, such as a space-occupying lesion like a ganglion cyst, can cause similar neuropathic pain [3]. Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the posterior tibial nerve and its branches, between the calcaneum and the medial malleolus under the cover of the flexor retinaculum [4, 5]. TTS can be misdiagnosed as ankle arthritis and lumbar radiculopath [6]. However, patients with ankle arthritis have radiologic evidence of it. TTS can be distinguished from lumbar radiculopathy because patients suffering from TTS have no reflex changes, and motor and sensory changes are localized to the distribution of the distal posterior tibial nerve and its branches. Secondary TTS by a ganglion is unusual,[4,5] but it can occur. Kirby and colleagues [7]) found that ganglion cysts were the most common benign lesion of the foot, accounting for nearly one-third of all cases. The size and location of the ganglion cyst is influences entrapment neuropathy because the volume of the tarsal tunnel compartment ranges from 18 cm3 to 21 cm3 in normal individuals [8]). In addition, Takakura and colleagues ([9] mentioned that a large ganglion can easily be diagnosed by MRI, but is difficult if it is smaller than 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm. A cystic and completely anechoic fluid collection around the ankle detected by USG commonly represents a ganglion cyst [10].

Conclusion


In conclusion, neuropathy arising from progressing occult pathology should be diagnosed early with high degree of suspicion by modern imaging facilities and treated adequately to avoid permanent neuropathic pain and functional disability. When a suddenly exacerbated case of neuropathy is encountered, a space-occupying lesion such as a ganglion cyst should be considered and clinicians must try to detect it as soon as possible. MRI may be a helpful device for this effort. The unique clinical symptoms and signs of our diagnosis of a ganglion causing medial plantar nerve compression were confirmed by MRI and then operative findings.

References


1. Waldman SD: Posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. In: Atlas of Common Pain Syndromes. 2nd ed. Philadelphia,Saunders Elsevier. 2007,pp 337-9.
2. Greer Richardson E.:From Neurogenic disorders: Tarsal Tunnel syndrome. In Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Volume 4th. Elevanth Edition.Edited by S. Terry Canale, James H. Beaty 2008; 83: 4717-4721.
3. Ferraresi S, Leidi P, Leidi M, Ubiali E, Bortolotti G, Cassinari V: Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Report of a case and review of clinical and surgical aspects. Ital J Neurol Sci 1992; 13: 47-51.
4. Taguchi Y, Nosaka K, Yasuda K, Teramoto K, Mano M, Yamamoto S: The tarsal tunnel syndrome: report of two cases of unusual cause. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 217:247-52.
5. Brown RJ: Tarsal tunnel syndrome due to a ganglion: a case report. Ulster Med J 1982; 51: 127-9.
6. Lam SJ: Tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49: 87-92.
7. Kirby EJ, Shereff MJ, Lewis MM: Soft-tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions of the foot. An analysis of eighty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71:621-6.
8. Bracilovic A, Nihal A, Houston VL, Beattie AC, Rosenberg ZS, Trepman E: Effect of foot and ankle position on tarsal tunnel compartment volume. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 431-7.
9. Takakura Y, Kumai T, Takaoka T, Tamai S: Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by coalition associated with a ganglion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 130-3.
10. Chhem RK, Beauregard G, Schmutz GR, Benko AJ: Ultrasonography of the ankle and the hindfoot. Can Assoc Radiol J 1993; 44: 337-41.

Acknowledgement


Consent "Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal."
Authors' contributions “IHWand AQS analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the disease. MJ discussed the case with radiology and pathology experts and formulated the investigative and treatment plan. AQS and IHW performed the biopsy. IHW was responsible for followup and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)