Research articles
 

By Mrs. Irina Batkovska-Borozanova , Dr. Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska , Prof. Suzana Trajkovic-Jolevska
Corresponding Author Mrs. Irina Batkovska-Borozanova
Faculty of Pharmacy, UKIM, Institute of Applied Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje - Republic of Macedonia
Submitting Author Dr. Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska
Other Authors Dr. Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska
Faculty of Pharmacy, UKIM, Institute of Applied Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje - Republic of Macedonia

Prof. Suzana Trajkovic-Jolevska
Faculty of Pharmacy, UKIM, Institute of Applied Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje - Republic of Macedonia

PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES

Filgrastim, RP-HPLC, Validation, Oxidation forms, Pharmaceutical formulations

Batkovska-Borozanova I, Tonic-Ribarska J, Trajkovic-Jolevska S. New High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method For Analysis Of Filgrastim In Pharmaceutical Formulations. WebmedCentral PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 2010;1(11):WMC001117
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2010.001117
No
Submitted on: 03 Nov 2010 12:33:22 PM GMT
Published on: 03 Nov 2010 09:35:12 PM GMT

Abstract


Filgrastim is a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor‚ which belongs to a family of cytokines. It is produced by recombinant DNA technology in genetically engineered Escherihia coli cells. Filgrastim has a biological action essential for proliferation and differentiation of hematopoetic and progenitor cells. Itis used for decreasing the risk of infection in cancer patients, who receive chemotherapy or a bone marrow transplant.
The goal of this study was to develop and validate a simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for determination of filgrastim in protein formulations.
The experiments were carried out by RP- HPLC using LiChrospherÒ WP 300 RP-18e, (150 x 4 mm i.d.) column.The HPLC system was operated at gradient mode using mobile phase composed of solvent A (0,1 % TFA in a mixture of water : acetonitril = 90:10 v/v) and solvent B ( 0.08% TFA in a mixture of water: acetonitril = 10:90 v/v). The temperature was 50°C and UV detection was set at 215 nm. The method was validated according the ICH guidelines. Under the proposed chromatographic conditions, the retention time for Filgrastim was about 25 min. Good linearity of the method was confirmed by the high value of the corelation coefficient (r2 = 0.9995), over a concentration range from 32 - 256 μg/ml. The RSD values for repeatability and inter-day precision were 0.45 % and 0.48 % , respectively. The obtained recovery values of 99.30 -101.38% indicate that the proposed method is quantitative and accurate.
In conclusion, the RP-HPLC method used for determination of filgrastim complies with the requirements of the validation paremeters, justifying its purpose for routine analysis..

Introduction


Filgrastim is a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)‚ which belongs to a family of cytokines. Its essential action is to stimulate the production of neutrophils, thus range filgrastim among drugs called hematopoetic (blood-forming) agents and it is used for decreasing the risk of infection in cancer patients, who receive chemotherapy or a bone marrow transplant. [1-5]. Filgrastim is a 175 amino-acid polypeptide produced by recombinant DNA technology in genetically engineered Escherichia coli cells. Filgrastim differs from the natural hormone in that the former is not glycosylated and contains an additional methionine group at the N terminus, which is necessary for expression of the gene in E. coli [6,7]. Filgrastim contains four methionine residues: Met1, Met122, Met127 and Met138, which are susceptible to oxidation. Hydrogen peroxide induces oxidation of methionine residues to methionine sulfoxide, which leads to the inactivity of protein pharmaceuticals [8-18].
RP-HPLC is widely used in the analysis of protein therapeutic products in the pharmaceutical industry. The goal of this study was to develop a simple and sensitive RP-HPLC method for determination of filgrastim in protein formulations and to validate the method according the ICH guidelines, which can also be used to follow the oxidized forms of filgrastim.

Experimental


Chemicals and reagents
Filgrastim was obtained from Roche products. All reagents used were of HPLC grade or analytical grade. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) p.a. and acetonitril were purchased from Merck, Germany. Hydrogen peroxide was purchased from Alkaloid, Skopje. HPLC grade water was used through the study.
Apparatus and chromatographic conditions
Varian HPLC system was used, equipped with Varian Prostar 240 pump, Varian 325 LC Detector and Galaxie1.9.301.220 software for data handling.
The experiments were carried out on LichrospherÒ WP 300 rp-18e, (150 x 4 mm i.d.) column. The HPLC system was operated at gradient mode using mobile phase composed of solvent A (0,1 % TFA in a mixture of water : acetonitril = 90:10) and solvent B (0.08 % TFA in a mixture of acetonitrile : water = 90:10) . The column was initially equilibrated with 40 % B to 60 % B over 10 minutes at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and from 60 % B to 70 % B over 20 minutes at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. Gradient mode is presented in Illustration 1.
The temperature was 50°C and the UV detection was set at 215 nm.
Preparation of standard and sample solutions of Filgrastim
The standard and sample solution of filgrastim were prepared by dissolving with water to the working concentration of 128 µg/ml.
The calibration curve was constructed with five standard concentrations of filgrastim in the range from 32-256 μg/ml.
The sample solution intended for induced oxidation was prepared by dissolving filgrastim with 0.1% hydrogen peroxide solution to the same concentration as a standard solution (128 µg/ml).


Results and discusion


A simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for determination of filgrastim was developed and validated. Good linearity, repeatability and accuracy were achieved.
Under the proposed chromatographic conditions, the retention time for filgrastim was about 25 min (Illustration 2a and 2b)
Validation parameters
Linearity was performed using five concentrations of filgrastim solution in the range from 32 - 256 μg/ml. The calibration curve was constructed by plotting the area of the peaks against concentration. A linear regression by the least squares method was applied.
Good linearity of the method was confirmed by the high value of the corelation coefficient (a =105.65; b = -913.42; r2 = 0.9995).
Precision is confirmed as repeatability (intra-day precision) and inter-day precision.
The repeatability is determined by six replicate injections of the same sample of standard solution of filgrastim in concentration of 128 μg/ml on the same day, under the same experimental condition. The RSD (%) of peak areas and also the RSD (%) of obtained concentrations were calculated (Illustration 3).
Inter-day precision of the RP-HPLC method was determined in six days by three replicate injections of standard solution of filgrastim in concentration of 128 μg/ml each day The RSD values (%) for inter-day precision were 0.48 % and 0.45% calculated through peak areas and concentrations(µg/ml), respectively (Illustration 4).
The accuracy of the method was determined by five concentration levels recovery study of the filgrastim, with repeatability of three injections at each concentration level.The obtained recovery of 99.30 -101.38% indicates that the proposed method is quantitative and accurate (Illustration 5.).
Detection limit and quantification limit were calculated using the data from regression analyses of linear correlation between concentrations and areas under peaks [19-21]. tThe slope from calibration curve and residual standard deviation of a regression line were used to calculate LOD and LOQ.
Detection limit and quantification limit were found to be 8.03 μg/ml and 24.35 μg/ml, respectively.
Oxidation of Filgrastim
One of the main problems of protein drugs is their instability, both chemical and physical. Chemical instability of filgrastim, among others, is due to the presence of four methionine residues susceptible to oxidation and quality control of filgrastim always include investigation of the presence of oxidized forms.
For that reason, the proposed RP-HPLC was applied for the analysis of samples of filgrastim with induced oxidation by adding 0.1 % hydrogen peroxide solution. Representative chromatograms of filgrastim and filgrastim with specific oxidized forms occured in definite critical time points were presented (Illustration 6. a-c). The chromatograms have shown that different oxidized forms are detected and satisfactory separated, which allow us to assume that the method was shown to be suitable for following the oxidized forms of filgrastim. Further investigations are to be carried out in order to study the oxidation of methionine residues of Filgrastim in definite time intervals.

Conclusion


Although there are many HPLC methods applicable for determination of proteins in pharmaceutical preparations, in this study the RP-HPLC method which is used for both determination of filgrastim in protein formulations and separation and detection of oxidized forms of filgrastim in the beginning of their formation was developed.
The developed RP-HPLC method used for determination of filgrastim complies with the requirements of the validation parameters. It was shown to be simple and economical, which gives the opportunity for its use in quantitative determination in routine quality control of filgrastim preparations.

References


1.Block J.H, Beale J.M. Wilson and Gisvold’s Textbook of Organic Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 11th Ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , USA, 2004: 863-865
2.Roitt I., Brostoff J., Male D. Immunology . Mosby, London, 1998: 271-273
3.Carpenter J.F., Manning M.C., Rational design of stable protein formulations: theory and practice;Pharm. Biotechnology, Plenum Publishers, New York, 2002: 1-100
4.Pearlman R., Wang Y. J., Formulation, characterization and stability of Protein Drugs. Pharm. Biotechnology, Plenum Press, NewYork, 1996: 11-36
5.Yoshioka S., Stella V.J., Stability of drugs and dosage forms. Plenum Publishers, NewYork, 2000: 187-205
6.Jhih-Wei Chu, Jin Yin, Daniel I.C.Wang, Bernhardt L.Trout, Molecular Dynamics and Simulations and Oxidations Rates of methionine Residues of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor at Different pH Values, Biochem. 2004; 43:1019-1029
7.McNally E. J., Protein formulation and Delivery. Marcel Deccer, NewYork, 2000; 5-28
8.Banga A.K. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: formulation, processing and delivery systems. Technomic Publishing Company, Pennsylvania, USA, 1995; 61-81
9.Lu H. S., Fausset P.R., Narhi L. O., Horan T., Shinagawa K., Shimamoto G. and Boones T.C. Chemical modification and Site Directed Mutagenesis of Methionine Residues in Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor: Effect on Stability and Biological Activity. Biochemistry and biophysics, 1999; 1-11
10.Rodriguez-Diaz R, Wehr T.,. Tuck S.F, Analytical techniques for biopharmaceutical development. Marcel Dekker, NewYork, 2005; 27-67
11.Carr D., The Handbook of the Analysis and Purification of Peptides and Proteins by Reversed-Phase HPLC, 3rd Ed., 2002;  1-70
12.Herman A.C., Boone T.C. and Lu S., Characterization, formulation and stability of Neupogen [filgrastim], a recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, In: Formulation, Characterization and Stability of Protein Drugs. Pearlman, R., Wang, Y.J., Ed, Plenum Press. New York, 1996; 303-326
13.Richards F. M., Protein stability: still an unsolved problem. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 1997; 53: 790-802
14.Wang W., Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals. Int. J. Pharm., 1999; 185: 129-188
15. Sven Frokjaer, Daniel E. Otzen, (2005) Protein drug stability: a formulation challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 298-306
16.Vincent H.L.Lee Peptide and Protein Drug Delivery. Marcel Dekker, NewYork , 1991; 247-359
17.Lu H.S., Clogston C.L., Narhi L.O., Merewether L.A., Pearl W.R.and.Boone T.C Folding and Oxidtion of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Produced in E.coli, J. of Biol. Chem. , 1992; 267(13): 8770-8777
18.Jhih-Wei C., Brooks B.R.and Trout B.L., Oxidation of Methonine Residues in Aqueous Solutions: Free Methionone and Methionine in Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor. J.Am.Chem.Soc., 2004; 126(50): 16601-16607
19.International conference on harmonisation (ICH) of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Specifications: Test procedures and acceptance criteria for biotechnological/biological products (Q6B), 1999; 1-16
20.International conference on harmonisation (ICH) of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Quality of biotechnological products: Stability testing of biotechnological/biological products (Q5C), 1995; 1-8
21.International conference on harmonisation (ICH) of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Validation of analytical procedures:text and methodology(Q2R1), 2005; 1-17
22.Trajkovic-Jolevska S., Tonic-Ribarska J. and Dimitrovska A., Instabilities of proteins: theoretical aspects, degradation products and methods for their detection. Maced. Pharm. Bull., 2005; 51: 3-8
23.Dalmora, S.L. Validation of an RP-LC Method and Assessment of rhG-CSF in Pharmaceutical  Formulations by Liquid Chromatography and Biological Assay. J. of Liquid  Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2006;  29(2):1753-1767
24.Nguyen L. T., Characterization methods for the physical stability of biopharmaceuticals, PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol., 2003;  57: 429-445
25. Jhih-Wei C., Jin Y., Wang D.I.C., and Trout B. L. Understanding Oxidative Instability of Protein Pharmaceuticals., 2003; www.dispace.mit.edu
26.Jhih-Wei C., Jin Y., Mazyar O. A., Lin-Tang G., Yap M. G. S., Wang D.I.C. and Trout B. L. , Stabilization of Therapeutic Proteins. 2002; www.dispace.mit.edu

Source(s) of Funding


none

Competing Interests


none

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Comments
1 comment posted so far

about illustrations Posted by Ms. Irina B Borozanova on 04 Mar 2011 04:46:38 PM GMT

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)