Submited on: 24 Sep 2011 06:02:26 PM GMT
Published on: 25 Sep 2011 03:35:47 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Intriguing and well-presented case study. Welcomed.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Thompson, S.B.N., Eccleston, L., & Hickish, T., 2011. Post-traumatic stress disorder in cancer survivors: recognising and acknowledging the symptoms. Oncology, 2(8), 1-16. doi: WMC002062.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rehabilitation, oncology.

  • How to cite:  Thompson S B.A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma: A Review[Review of the article 'A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma Overexpressing Her2 ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00974
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    Abstract must be rewritten giving more details about methodology, treatment, follow up, results, and conclusion

    Key words must be added

    No illustrations included. It is necessary to include the IHC photos and to state the cut off values.

    It will be better to do FISH as it is more efficient than IHC in detecting Her-2.

    CA15-3 of 38 IU/ml is not high since the cut off value is 36. It is also important to state the reference value depending on the technique and kit (ELISA or RIA)

    Authors did not refer to table I in the text

    There is language problem in mixing French with English

    Some titles in the reference put in title case and the rest are not so it has to be unified

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I worked on many types of cancer including breast cancer

  • How to cite:  El-Abd E I.A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma Overexpressing HER2 [Review of the article 'A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma Overexpressing Her2 ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00971
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It could be better wirtten

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I work with analitical cytology and cancer

  • How to cite:  Bedin V .A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma Overexpressing HER2 [Review of the article 'A Rare Case of Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma Overexpressing Her2 ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00970
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse