WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 23 Aug 2011 01:53:46 AM GMT

Published on: 23 Aug 2011 06:24:44 PM GMT

Radiation induced osteosarcoma

Posted by Dr. Thomas F Heston on 26 Aug 2011 05:17:51 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
Interesting article. I would be interested in any updates to the clinical outcome of the case study presented. In addition, would be interested in the role of imaging in early detection of RIO. Is there a role for PET/CT in the opinion of the authors?
Competing interests:
n/a
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Nuclear medicine physician.
How to cite: Heston T F.Radiation induced osteosarcoma[Review of the article 'Maxillary Osteosarcomas after Irradiation for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Lilerrature ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00907

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse