Submited on: 05 Aug 2011 03:29:53 PM GMT
Published on: 07 Aug 2011 09:28:50 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Very interesting paper with an excellent review and a critical point of view. Authors emphasize the relevance of psychological evaluation in all these patients even in early stages of the disease process to prevent or diagnose or treat as soon as possible every symptom. In my opinion this article would deserve to be known by all the professionals who work in this area.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Medical Oncologist

  • How to cite:  Una Cidon E .Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00957
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Thank you for spending the time to read and review our article. It is always very much appreciated when a respected professional in the field responds and recognises the work undertaken in this important area of medicine. Ass.Prof.Dr.Simon Thompson
Responded by Dr. Simon B Thompson on 23 Sep 2011 03:57:43 PM

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This version is clearer and a great asset to the knowledge on the subject.

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rehabilitation.

  • How to cite:  Jones N .Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors......[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00901
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
p
Posted by Mr. Brian Thompson on 23 Aug 2011 04:55:04 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This version is clearer and a great contribution to the area.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assisted in rehab.

  • How to cite:  Thompson B .p[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00899
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
PTSD
Posted by Ms. Holly Chinnery on 22 Aug 2011 04:51:36 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Adds to the area of PTSD as a result of a physical illnes.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Recovery worker

  • How to cite:  Chinnery H .PTSD[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00897
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Interesting to look at the psychological aspects of a physical condition.  

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Mental Health rehabilition 

  • How to cite:  Chinnery H .Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00891
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Excellent paper: highlighting value of psycholical assessment.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assitiing in rehabilitation.

  • How to cite:  Thompson B .Post-Tramatic Sress Disorder in Cancer Survivors:...............................[Review of the article 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Cancer Survivors: Recognising and Acknowledging the Symptoms ' by Hickish T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00883
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse