WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. Kenneth C Uzoka on 08 Aug 2011 08:49:17 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	No
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments: Good article but being a case report,there is no data to justify conclusion.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Radiologist with special interest in oncologic imaging.
How to cite: Uzoka K C.Gleason 4+4=8 Advanced Adenocarcinoma of Prostate in a 44 years old patient: a case report and a review of the literature.[Review of the article 'Gleason 4+4 = 8 Advanced Adenocarcinoma Of Prostate In A 44 Years-old Patient: A Case Report And A Review Of The Literature ' by Baiden-Amissah K].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00885

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Posted by Dr. Luigi Mearini on 25 Dec 2010 04:51:19 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
was there a family history of prostate cancer?

please, discuss why you excluded palliative role of radiotherapy in such young patient

did you tested CGA values?
Competing interests:
none
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

good
How to cite: Mearini L .Gleason 4+4 = 8 Advanced Adenocarcinoma Of Prostate In A 44 Years-old Patient: A Case Report And A Review Of The Literature. [Review of the article 'Gleason 4+4 = 8 Advanced Adenocarcinoma Of Prostate In A 44 Years-old Patient: A Case Report And A Review Of The Literature ' by Baiden-Amissah K].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00287

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse