WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 11 Dec 2010 09:26:34 PM GMT

Published on: 13 Dec 2010 02:54:51 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. Emad Bakir on 12 Jul 2011 02:55:00 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This is not new and uncommon area of interest, however the article rises the issue and awarness of fractured corpus cavernosum by jonior doctors.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Interventional and diagnostic Radiologist
How to cite: Bakir E .Traumatic Rupture of corpus Cavernosum ( fracture of Penis)[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;2(7):WMCRW00857

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse