Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Partly
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
No
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
No
Other Comments:
There is no key words. result parts of abstract need to make minar correction. Standard deviation is given not in text . It should be like Sd =1.23
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Public Health
How to cite: Aryal U .Lung Function Among Improved and Traditional Cooking Stove Users [Review of the article 'Lung Function Among Improved and Traditional Cooking Stove Users ' by Tuladhar B].WebmedCentral 2011;2(6):WMCRW00817
There is no key words. result parts of abstract need to make minar correction. Standard deviation is given not in text . It should be like Sd =1.23
No
Yes
No
None
Public Health