Submited on: 24 Apr 2011 06:17:17 PM GMT
Published on: 26 Apr 2011 07:33:49 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This study largely confirms the findings of many other publications on this topic. The tables do not reproduce well in the pdf format. It would be preferred if findings were consistently represented as percent resistant OR percent susceptible.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Infectious Diseases physician

  • How to cite:  Herchline T .Emerging Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter Strains Isolated from ICU Patients[Review of the article 'Emerging Antibiotic Resistance in Psedomonas and Acinetobacter Strains Isolated from ICU Patients: Comparison of Years 1999, 2006 and 2009 ' by Sengoz G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW00988
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article is a valuable article that pointed out the emerging antimicrobial resistance of nonfermenters in ICUs. It is important to monitorize the resistance patterns of these agents in ICUs and in hospitals.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Şeng?z, G., Ş. Karabela, Y. Durdu, et al. Determination of isepamicin resistance in Pseudomonas strains and comparison with other aminoglycosides. Klimik Dergisi 2005; 18(1): 41-4.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Yes. I have a similar study.

  • How to cite:  Karabela S .Emerging Antibiotic Resistance in Psedomonas and Acinetobacter Strains Isolated from ICU Patients: Comparison of Years 1999, 2006 and 2009[Review of the article 'Emerging Antibiotic Resistance in Psedomonas and Acinetobacter Strains Isolated from ICU Patients: Comparison of Years 1999, 2006 and 2009 ' by Sengoz G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(6):WMCRW00813
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse