Submited on: 12 Mar 2011 03:20:38 PM GMT
Published on: 14 Mar 2011 09:55:05 PM GMT
 
Variation in Ultrasound Education World Wide
Posted by Dr. Thomas F Heston on 20 May 2011 07:09:35 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a nice descriptive article on the use of ultrasonography around the world. While the article is short on how the author came to the conclusions, it does not pretend to be scientifically quantitative.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Nuclear physician.

  • How to cite:  Heston T F.Variation in Ultrasound Education World Wide[Review of the article 'Ultrasound Education & Research in Developing Countries ' by Gilani S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00774
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    In my opinion it's good experience specially from a person like prof Gilani, who interact with more than 70 systems in different countries, so we can know which is good, and how we can be good. and I think there is some points need explanations from the establishments it self. and there is some points need some considerations like the economy of the contries and corruption and other factors

    Well Done Prof Gilani

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have PhD in Ultrasound, and I have experience wth two governmental establishments of education in sudan and in saudi arabia

  • How to cite:  Awadallah Musa M .Ultrasound Education & Research in Developing Countries [Review of the article 'Ultrasound Education & Research in Developing Countries ' by Gilani S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00642
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    In this article authors have presented “Ultrasound Education &
    Research in Developing Countries” is a good review of ultrasound
    awareness in the developing countries based on their rich experience
    and have focused on the strength and weakness of ultrasound users. The
    presentation of the article is mostly accessible. It is written well,
    the coverage of the topic is comprehensive and balanced. The article
    is recommended for acceptance.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    25 years

  • How to cite:  Dubey R B.Ultrasound Education & Research in Developing Countries[Review of the article 'Ultrasound Education & Research in Developing Countries ' by Gilani S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00598
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse