Submited on: 14 Oct 2010 10:27:38 AM GMT
Published on: 16 Oct 2010 10:56:41 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    good and comprehensive clinical research

    prevalence of hypertension and proteinuria in this study are a little influenced of multiple pregnancies in probably 25 cases which is not fully elaborated. 

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
    refernce number 12 in this article
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    worked in the biggest renal transplant centre in country for 8 years and helped in management of  anumber of renal transplant receipients with pregnancy.

  • How to cite:  Mamun H .obstetrics in renal transplantation:a series of cases of pregnancy post transplant observed over24 years[Review of the article 'Obstetrics In Renal Transplantation: A Series Of Cases Of Pregnancy Post Transplant Observed Over 24 Years ' by Naqvi R].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00634
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse