WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. Sarosh Khan on 08 Mar 2011 03:08:36 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
Although the first case report came as early as 1999 by T. Aoyagi from Japan, this case report stresses the need to know about the problem as Sildenafil is one of the most misused OTC drug available in India and elsewhere.

Diction OK overall except in the first line of Abstract "has" should be replaced by "have" and then in para 3 line 2, it should be "perusal" or "persuation" rather than "perusation". Otherwise very readable.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
1. Khan LA, Khan SA. Be Ready for Viagra (editorial) Practitioner, East Mediterranean Edition. 1999; 10(9) 323. 2. Khan SA. Sildenafil (Viagra) a breakthrough in the management of an old problem or a risky drug? (correspondence) Saudi Med J 1999; 20:807. 3. Khan LA, Khan SA, Al-Hateeti H. Sildenafil (ViagraTM) may cause Nasal Stuffiness (Letter to Editor). Annals of Saudi Med. 1999; 19(5): 468.
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I see many patients in practice who have ED especially patients with diabetes mellitus who have history of self-medication with sildenafil and tadalafil.
How to cite: Khan S .Useful Case Report on Sildenafil induced Priapism due to it's Misuse[Review of the article 'Priapism Induced With Single Oral Dose Of Sildenafil: A Rare Case Report ' by Yadav R].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00560

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Sildenafil Priapism

Posted by Dr. Bennett N on 21 Jan 2011 06:48:42 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This manuscript is well written and informative. It would have been advantagous to have follow-up data on the patient.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I am a board-certified urologist with fellowship training in malse sexual function.
How to cite: N B .Sildenafil Priapism[Review of the article 'Priapism Induced With Single Oral Dose Of Sildenafil: A Rare Case Report ' by Yadav R].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00398

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse