WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 20 Nov 2010 06:39:46 PM GMT

Published on: 22 Nov 2010 04:19:19 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. vefik a arica on 06 Mar 2011 10:24:07 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	No
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
NA
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

NA
How to cite: arica v a.The neurophysiogical basis of origin and evolution of romantic kiss in humans[Review of the article 'The Neurophysiological Basis of Origin and Evolution of Romantic Kiss in Humans ' by Jaseja H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00549

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse