WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 26 Sep 2010 03:00:08 PM GMT

Published on: 27 Sep 2010 07:11:39 AM GMT

Posted by Dr. Yahaya Ahmed on 03 Mar 2011 10:23:56 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The article is correctly presented as early phase data because extensive validation is still required with wet laboratory. The main strenght of the article is the concept -which, though not quite novel, has been undertaken and presented with much clarity. The steps taken to avoid docking near haeme is quite novel
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Adequate
How to cite: Ahmed Y .An excellent use of in silico laboratory [Review of the article 'Computer Assisted Design and in- Silica Metabolic Exploration of a Hemoglobin Docking Molecule- Early Steps of a Novel Antiplasmodial Agent ' by Shuaibu A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00542

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse