Submited on: 08 Jan 2011 11:03:59 AM GMT
Published on: 10 Jan 2011 01:17:12 PM GMT
 
Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale
Posted by Dr. naresh kumar on 26 Feb 2011 12:17:59 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    good work

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    3yrs resideny

  • How to cite:  kumar n .Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale [Review of the article 'Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale ' by Shah A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00510
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale
Posted by Dr. naresh kumar on 26 Feb 2011 12:16:31 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    good work

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    3yrs resideny

  • How to cite:  kumar n .Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale [Review of the article 'Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale ' by Shah A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00509
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale
Posted by Dr. dipen nath on 26 Feb 2011 12:05:33 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    good management of the case its really difficult to diagnose these cases preoperatively...

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    3 yrs residency in gen surgery pgimer

  • How to cite:  nath d .Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale [Review of the article 'Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale ' by Shah A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00506
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale
Posted by Dr. Luigi Mearini on 16 Jan 2011 05:49:22 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    a well-done article

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    good

  • How to cite:  Mearini L . Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale [Review of the article 'Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale ' by Shah A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00375
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale
Posted by Dr. Muhammad Shamim on 10 Jan 2011 10:41:17 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The authors have done good job & presented the case in clear & concise way.

     

    However, the case report section needs language & grammatical corrections.

     

    Discussion section needs correlation of international literature with the current case report. Adding simple phrases like as in this case as compared to literature, at appropriate places will suffice.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    14 years.

  • How to cite:  Shamim M .Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale[Review of the article 'Case Report On Paraganglioma Duodenale ' by Shah A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00355
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse