WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 07 Oct 2010 10:40:07 AM GMT

Published on: 07 Oct 2010 08:07:14 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. Jagdale SC on 24 Feb 2011 06:01:26 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The present work is good.

In the present work the drug and excipient compatibility study shoud be carried out.

In the work how the author has seleted the range of polymers is not explain.

Comparision of effect of both polymer shoud be discuss in detail.
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

The field has lo of potential for drug delivery.
How to cite: SC J .Ionotropic Gelation Technique For Microencapsulation Of Antihypertensive Drug [Review of the article 'Ionotropic Gelation Technique For Microencapsulation Of Antihypertensive Drug ' by Patel G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00502

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse