WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Comments to author

Posted by Dr. Qi S on 21 Feb 2011 02:10:02 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The authors did a good evaluation for the education of the year one doctors. As my opinion, his result is reliable. I agreed with his point.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Neurosurgery, Brain tumor
How to cite: S Q .Comments to author[Review of the article 'The Knowledge And Skills Of Surgical Foundation Year One Doctors In A Teaching Hospital A Review And Results Of A Survey ' by Mughal M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00491

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Posted by Dr. Bhagteshwar Singh on 17 Feb 2011 08:52:13 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
An excellent article - each section is concise and relevant, with well written interpretations and lietrature review in the discussion. My only suggestion is that, despite a clear, easy to follow results section, some figures would be useful in displaying the salient findings for the rushed or more casual reader.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

No formal academic experience
How to cite: Singh B .Review of: The Knowledge And Skills Of Surgical Foundation Year One Doctors In A Teaching Hospital A Review And Results Of A Survey[Review of the article 'The Knowledge And Skills Of Surgical Foundation Year One Doctors In A Teaching Hospital A Review And Results Of A Survey ' by Mughal M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00483

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Review

Posted by Mr. Anthony Chan on 02 Nov 2010 11:55:00 AM GMT

Other Comments: An excellent study reviewing the training and educational learning received by Foundation trainees.
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
None
How to cite: Chan A .Review[Review of the article 'The Knowledge And Skills Of Surgical Foundation Year One Doctors In A Teaching Hospital A Review And Results Of A Survey ' by Mughal M].WebmedCentral 2011;1(11):WMCRW00106

Report abuse