Submited on: 25 Jan 2011 07:45:11 PM GMT
Published on: 26 Jan 2011 08:35:14 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The study is not very clear if it was carried out in azoospermic subjects only, though it appears so.The number of subjects in each catagory is very small to draw out any valid conclusions. The results can at the most may be said to be showing a possibility. The presentation is good. Mentioning at the outset that it is an observational study would increase the value of the presentation.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    35 years

  • How to cite:  Ghosh U K.Role of serum hormone indices including inhibin B and scrotal ultrasound in evaluation of non obstructive male factor infertility[Review of the article 'Role Of Serum Hormone Indices Including Inhibin B And Scrotal Ultrasound In Evaluation Of Non Obstructive Male Factor Infertility ' by Sikarwar S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00473
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse