Submited on: 26 Sep 2010 12:53:42 PM GMT
Published on: 26 Sep 2010 02:43:02 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Endoscopic picture of the mass has not been included in the article.

    Radiological images not included in the article

  • Competing interests:
    I have no competing interest to declare.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am an otolaryngologist.  This is my field of interest

  • How to cite:  Thiagarajan B .Bilateral Naso sinusal glandular hamartoma a case report[Review of the article 'Bilateral Naso-sinusal Glandular Hamartoma: A Case Report ' by Pignataro L].WebmedCentral 2011;3(4):WMCRW001737
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Original and interesting paper

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    expertice in naso-sinusal surgery

  • How to cite:  Mantovani M .Bilateral Naso-sinusal Glandular Hamartoma: A Case Report [Review of the article 'Bilateral Naso-sinusal Glandular Hamartoma: A Case Report ' by Pignataro L].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00411
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Interesting paper on an original item

  • Competing interests:
    nothing to declare
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rhinology

  • How to cite:  Cappadona M .Bilateral naso-sinusal glandular hamartoma: a case report[Review of the article 'Bilateral Naso-sinusal Glandular Hamartoma: A Case Report ' by Pignataro L].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00302
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse