Submited on: 29 Oct 2010 06:54:09 AM GMT
Published on: 29 Oct 2010 08:22:27 AM GMT
review of Partirition in domestic animals
Posted by Dr. Sumant Vyas on 12 Jan 2011 12:18:16 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Inclusions of some more illustrations will improve the review article. 

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
    It is already included in the present review.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am working in the area of animal reproduction since 1988.

  • How to cite:  Vyas S .review of Partirition in domestic animals[Review of the article 'Parturition In Domestic Animals: A Review ' by Purohit G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00361
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse