-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
,
Mr. Raphael Elias Cury 
,
Dr. Sérgio Neves Cury
,
Prof. Maria Dorotea Cury
,
Prof. Hélder Antônio Pontes
,
Prof. Décio Pinto Jr
-
What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
The mais claim was to show a rare case of tumor and ths is very important to understand the disease.
-
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
No, because it is a case report.
-
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Yes the claims ae properly placed in the context of the previous literature.
-
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
Yes. The paper is pretty well documented and well presented with technical support.
-
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
NA
-
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
Yes. As a case report it contaisn everything that is needed.
-
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
I think the authors will save this case to join others around the world. This woul result in a bigger work.
-
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
Yes, it is outstanding because it is well recorded, well written an very well presented.
-
Other Comments:
I would like to congratulate the authors because I know it is not easy to make science in a country like Brazil.
-
Competing interests:
None
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
I have a master degree and a doctorate in pathology and I have been teaching medicine for the last 30 years.
- How to cite: Bedin V .A Rare Tumor[Review of the article 'Trabecular Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma (WHO-type): case report ' by Pinto Jr D].WebmedCentral 2013;4(5):WMCRW002712
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a
To report an unusual case of a Trabecular Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma.
No
Yes
Authors make interesting review on this neoplasm and present a case. No more is necessary.
NA
NA
No
Yes. Student on Oral and maxillofacial Pathology must read it.
This manuscript will be more objective and comprehensible if authors separate individually all the photoraphic material. Under the present condictions. Not very much features can be seen.
None
No
No
No
I am an Oral and maxillofacial Pathologist