Submited on: 09 Dec 2010 08:07:23 AM GMT
Published on: 10 Dec 2010 07:37:00 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Was it possible to include photos? The photographs of ultrasound images and visual behaviour like cocking of tail may improve the article.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    It is already included.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am working in area of animal reproduction since 1988. 

  • How to cite:  Vyas S .the review of the article "methods of pregnancy diagnosis in domestic animals: The current status".[Review of the article 'Methods Of Pregnancy Diagnosis In Domestic Animals: The Current Status ' by Purohit G].WebmedCentral 2010;2(1):WMCRW00360
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Over all review of article entitled
Posted by Dr. Nitin Bhatia on 11 Dec 2010 07:18:38 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article provides a review of available data on pregnancy diagnosis in Farm animals. The data compiled is based on available information and author expertise in the area of Animal Reproduction

  • Competing interests:
    Veterinary Medicine
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am myself a Post graduate Vet and a editor of Intas Polivet, a Veterinary Journal from the Indian domain abstracted and reviewed nationally and internationally

  • How to cite:  Bhatia N .Over all review of article entitled [Review of the article 'Methods Of Pregnancy Diagnosis In Domestic Animals: The Current Status ' by Purohit G].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00229
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse