Submited on: 12 Oct 2010 10:56:12 AM GMT
Published on: 07 Oct 2010 06:16:08 PM GMT
 
A Review
Posted by Dr. Manuel,PhD Hens on 10 Dec 2010 09:19:01 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Methods used during sample selection were systematic and highly valuable.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am specialist in prevention of labour risks.

  • How to cite:  Hens M .A Review[Review of the article 'Does The Cornell Medical Index Measure Real Or Perceived Occupational Health?' by Alfonso-Sanchez J].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00220
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse