-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
Submited on: 28 Oct 2010 03:34:22 PM GMT
Published on: 28 Oct 2010 09:02:55 PM GMT
-
Other Comments:
I think author should add a table about two different type porokeratosis co-existing in a patents or family.
-
Competing interests:
no
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
I had published three paper about gene mapping for porkeratosis.
- How to cite: S W .Good case is suit for publishing[Review of the article 'Type2 Segmental Manifestation Of Disseminated Superficial Actinic Porokeratosis In An 8 Year Old Girl ' by Sinha P].WebmedCentral 2012;2(2):WMCRW00486
The authors report here co-existence of 2 different types of Porokeratosis in a 8 year old girl. They substantiate their finding with histopathology. Porokeratosis itself has variants or subtypes. The co-existence of more than one type in an individual patient is indeed rare.
The co-existence of more than a single variety of porokeratosis in a patient is Rare nevertheless has been reported earlier in literature in children as young as 7 years-old.
Yes. Their case does have a rare entity.
The histopathology report and pictures of slides do support the clinical diagnosis.Though they could have considered Po
NA
NA
None
Yes.
The WRITE UP is average and could be IMPROVED. THE authors should have used their own language for the text. It is very obvious that it has followed the same line what has been mentioned in an earlier report of a similar case....
None
No
No
I have examined and treated these types of cases.