Submited on: 07 Dec 2010 11:20:04 PM GMT
Published on: 08 Dec 2010 08:51:04 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    A very good report of a rare case.

    The aricle is straight and to the point and reads well.

    There were no illustration and tables to comment on

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Not an expert in urology

  • How to cite:  Debrah S A.Tamsulosin-induced priapism: a rare complication associated withthe management of ureteric colic [Review of the article 'Tamsulosin-induced-priapism: A Rare Complication Associated With The Management Of Ureteric Colic ' by Venyo A].WebmedCentral 2010;2(2):WMCRW00445
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    none

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    good experience in andrological disease

  • How to cite:  Mearini L .Tamsulosin-induced-priapism: A Rare Complication Associated With The Management Of Ureteric Colic.[Review of the article 'Tamsulosin-induced-priapism: A Rare Complication Associated With The Management Of Ureteric Colic ' by Venyo A].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00213
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse