WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Mr. Joseph O Odey on 03 May 2012 06:18:18 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The authors have gone a great length in providing further information regarding the biological behaviour of urothelial carcinomas.
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I am a urologist of more than 20 years experience.
How to cite: Odey J O.DNA Ploidy and the expression of P53 IN HUMAN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA[Review of the article 'DNA Ploidy And The Expression Of P53 In Human Urothelial Carcinoma ' by Maloney D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001772

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Consultant Radiologist

Posted by Dr. Emad Bakir on 21 Jan 2011 04:29:08 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This is an excellent and usefull study, which shows the importance of P53 in predecting the outcome of this tumours following therapy, espesially the superficial tumours.

This study is a good illustration to show the expression of P53 in human urothelial cancer more important than DNA Ploidy in predecting outcome of urothelial cancer.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I am a consultant Radiologist dealing with Urothelial cancer diagnosis and treatment.
How to cite: Bakir E .Consultant Radiologist[Review of the article 'DNA Ploidy And The Expression Of P53 In Human Urothelial Carcinoma ' by Maloney D].WebmedCentral 2012;2(1):WMCRW00397

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse