Submited on: 23 Apr 2012 06:59:41 PM GMT
Published on: 24 Apr 2012 06:08:25 PM GMT
Malignancy after Lung Transplantation
Posted by Dr. Emad Bakir on 24 Apr 2012 06:57:57 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article highlights the necessity of research in the subject of developing cancer after solid organ transplantation.

    This is mainly to the mentioned immune suppression, further research and development of new generation medicine is required to prohebit cancer development.

    The article lack illustrations and is to short to cover this subject, however it is well written and exemplify the awarness of new research .

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Consultant interventional and diagnostic Radiologist

  • How to cite:  Bakir E .Malignancy after Lung Transplantation[Review of the article 'Malignancy After Lung Transplantation: A Literature Review ' by Sheikh F].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001727
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse