Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The authors have done a good review of the existing data on the topic. It throws some light on current management of the condition, which is though rare in tropical countries.
Competing interests: no
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
AS a physiologist interested in the discussion and findings
How to cite: Satish N S. It is Necessary for Adults to Continue a Phenylalanine Strict Diet After Diagnosis of Phenylketonuria During Childhood [Review of the article 'Is it Necessary for Adults to Continue a Phenylalanine Strict Diet After Diagnosis of Phenylketonuria During Childhood? ' by Siddiqui M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001692
The authors have done a good review of the existing data on the topic. It throws some light on current management of the condition, which is though rare in tropical countries.
no
No
No
None
AS a physiologist interested in the discussion and findings