Submited on: 31 Mar 2012 12:32:44 PM GMT
Published on: 03 Apr 2012 05:47:45 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:
    It's a very interesting perspective and original.
  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
    I worked for 20 years practically in the laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology.
  • How to cite:  Garcia G .On possible primary biological functionof cholera toxin: Interaction with Vibrio cholerae biofilms in the human intestine during infection.[Review of the article 'On Possible Primary Biological Function of Cholera Toxin: Interaction with Vibrio Cholerae Biofilms in the Human Intestine during Infection ' by Monastyrskaja I].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001667
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse