Submited on: 17 Mar 2012 12:13:41 PM GMT
Published on: 19 Mar 2012 07:06:53 AM GMT
 
gud wrk on anemia
Posted by Dr. Thiagarajan Saminadane on 20 Mar 2012 09:59:34 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

     

    Clean work on anemia..

    Historic evidences and how come the name PANDU was intersting.. 

    List of medicines used for treating those anemic cases can be explored...

    Anemia in pregnancy can be explained..

     

     

     

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Primary care for anemia in root level can prevent lot of ailments which can be even fatal

  • How to cite:  Saminadane T .gud wrk on anemia[Review of the article 'Aaaemia (Pandu) Primary Care in Siddha ' by Shanumuga Sundram N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001602
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse