Submited on: 24 Jan 2012 07:02:50 PM GMT
Published on: 25 Jan 2012 07:56:02 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    I personally feel that publication of articles that reflect current thinking and professional practice in a field of applied psychology in general and clinical psychology in particular should be considered as an important contribution for the professional growth and development of the field. I appreciate the efforts of the author to share the current thinking and professional practice of their country in the field of clinical psychology.  Sharing of such thoughts and ideas should be applauded inasmuch as it helps to develop insight how training and evaluation should be conducted in the field of clinical psychology to enhance the clinical skills and competence of the trainee.

    Development of the professional and practical aspect of psychology is as important as the development of its scientific aspect. And I think that publication of personal and shared professional experiences in form of an article is a welcome attempt in this direction. Most of us would agree that such articles are less likely to be given a chance to appear in the contemporary psychology journals as most of them focus on empirical research, comprehensive reviews and or theoretical articles dealing with some issues of contemporary relevance. However, they would also agree with me that sharing of such information is very critical and relevant to the development of the field of psychology. At the root of the development of any field of inquiry is the quality of training given to the graduate students. 

    I would also take this opportunity to thank the "WebmedCentral" team to provide a platform for publishing and sharing even such information that otherwise would have remained unpublished in the present era of scientific publication that rely heavily on pre-publication review process.

    I congratulate e the authors for bringing  out such excellent piece of work that I feel is very useful for setting a trend in  the professional training and practice of clinical psychology.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Professor of Psychology

  • How to cite:  Pandey R .Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology [Review of the article 'Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology ' by Baker R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001472
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This paper describes a very exciting improvement to current professional practice in clinical psychology. It provides students with excellent experience particularly by giving them an insight into practice with a placement experience. The paper is written in a clear and professional manner which I applaude. Excellent piece of work and very relevant and useful to the profession!

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rehabilitation.

  • How to cite:  Jones N .Review of 'Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology'[Review of the article 'Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology ' by Baker R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001439
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    As a graduate of this course I have found that it has greatly enhanced my skills and ignited my passion in working within Clinical Psychology.  

    The intergration of clinical experience, theory and research makes this postgraduate course unique by allowing development and leading towards one's area of preference.  It also allows for a solid foundation to build upon.  

    By ultising a variety of assessments, some (for example, role play) which is relevant within a clinical setting, allows one's skills to be further practised.  

    The course being spread over two days allows one to gain more clinical experience and/or help fund the course.  

     

    Overall, the course has a strong set-up and provides future trainees with the relavant skills needed within and related to this area.  

    This is a well written and acurate article to the course itself.  I have no hestitation in promoting this course to future students.  

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Graduated from the course. 

  • How to cite:  Chinnery H .Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology[Review of the article 'Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology ' by Baker R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001438
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article really updates current thinking in clinical psychology and is an asset to current knowledge in the area.

     

    Well done authors.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assisting in rehabilitation.

  • How to cite:  Thompson B .Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology[Review of the article 'Improving Professional Practice in Clinical Psychology ' by Baker R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001434
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse