Submited on: 22 Feb 2011 12:32:36 PM GMT
Published on: 22 Feb 2011 08:51:52 PM GMT
Postmortem etoh sampling review
Posted by Dr. Marie Bourgeois on 14 Jan 2012 11:09:01 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Very interesting evaluation that supports some other assessments that I have seen on choice of postmortem sampling sites.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a research toxicologist with experience in substance abuse. 

  • How to cite:  Bourgeois M .Postmortem etoh sampling review[Review of the article 'Importance Of Sampling Sites For Postmortem Evaluation Of Ethanol ' by Gumustekin M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001382
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse