Submited on: 29 Oct 2010 03:35:15 PM GMT
Published on: 30 Oct 2010 01:31:41 AM GMT
 
Glass Ionomer Cement Adhesion
Posted by Dr. William J Maloney on 11 Feb 2014 03:07:37 PM GMT Reviewed by Interested Peers

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    The authors' aim is to describe the benefits of Carisolv in treating carious lesions.


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    Yes


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    Yes


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    Yes


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    No


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    Yes


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    No


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    Yes-This would be a great seminar in a dental school.


  • Other Comments:

    Carisolv is a minimally invasive treatment method of carious lesions. The authors find the use of Carisolv to be beneficial as it minimizes dentin injury and provides an appropriate surface for adhesive bonding. Well written materials and results sections are also provided.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:

    None

  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Clinical associate professor

  • How to cite:  Maloney W J.Glass Ionomer Cement Adhesion[Review of the article 'Carious Dentin Treatment For Glass Ionomer Cement Adhesion: A Comparative Study ' by Vitale M].WebmedCentral 2012;5(2):WMCRW002970
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    26th Dec 2011

    Review on the Article:                                         

    Title: Carious dentin treatment for glass ionomer cement adhesion: A comparative study

    1. Title does not mention the type of evaluation done
    2. Type of materials used

     

    Introduction:

    1. First line to be reconsidered – Less invasive treatment of the dental lesion
    2. Ref 3 Bracket to be closed
    3. New Carisolve with shortened time and not times
    4. Several studies on effects of Carisolve but fewer articles on what property of Carisolve?

    Methods:

    1. What type of carious cavities did the molars have, involving enamel only or into dentin to be specified?
    2. Methodology does not include hand excavation also?
    3. Carisolve applied according to manufacturers instructions

     

    Results:

    1. First line: Phosphoric acid microradiographs should be changed and mentioned about the group.
    2. Result could have been better understood if it was separated under three headings: SEM, Microradiographs and X-ray microanalysis.

    Discussion:

    1. Phosphoric acid effect: First paragraph, 3rd line…Dentin lining OF carious cavities.
    2. Explanation for smaller phosphate crystals with Carisolve group is unexplained.

    Other observations:

    1. In vivo application: includes residual caries in the cavity
    2. Biological effects of the chemicals used and also the microorganisms packed under the restoration on the pulp.

     

    Reviewed by:

    Dr Shashi Rashmi Acharya

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Comparative studies are conducted on Adhesion in relation to various bonding systems, bond strengths and also with microleakage.

  • How to cite:  Acharya S .Carious Dentin treatment for glass ionomer cement Adhesion: A Comparative Study[Review of the article 'Carious Dentin Treatment For Glass Ionomer Cement Adhesion: A Comparative Study ' by Vitale M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001330
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse