Submited on: 28 Jul 2010 10:20:48 PM GMT
Published on: 28 Jul 2010 11:08:41 PM GMT
 
Trauma registry - yes!
Posted by Prof. Paul W Ackermann on 15 Dec 2011 10:00:32 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    The authors bring up an important topic. Their manuscript is however not complete. The methods and discussion part is lacking.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Trauma surgeon with experience of trauma registry.

  • How to cite:  Ackermann P W.Trauma registry - yes![Review of the article '"Trauma Registry"- A Necessity Of Modern Clinical Practice ' by Abdunabi M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001266
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    The points are well made and logical. However, the lack of references in the text give the impression that the argument is based on the authors opinion rather than research evidence. With proper referencing this article would provide a valid and useful contribution to the literature.

  • Competing interests:
    No competing interests.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Foundation trainee in orthopaedics

  • How to cite:  Kent W .A review of ''trauma Registry'' A Necessity Of Modern Clinical Practice [Review of the article '"Trauma Registry"- A Necessity Of Modern Clinical Practice ' by Abdunabi M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(6):WMCRW00823
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse